The sixth and seventh transmembrane domains in AT1 and AT2 receptors demonstrate structural flexibility and can mediate agonist-induced receptor activation despite amino acid dissimilarities, suggesting a common activation mechanism.
Supports shared AT1/AT2 activation mechanisms via TM6/7 flexibility; hypothesis-generating, leaves open translation to human therapies.
Chimeric AT1/AT2 angiotensin II (AngII) receptors in which the sixth and/or seventh transmembrane-spanning domains of the AT2 receptor were substituted into the AT1 receptor were used to investigate the activation mechanisms of the two receptor subtypes. Numerous reports have identified amino acid residues in the sixth and seventh transmembrane-spanning domains of the AT1 receptor involved in the intrareceptor activation mechanism following agonist binding. Many of these residues are not conserved in the AT2 receptor; the corresponding AT2 receptor residues are, in fact, disruptive of AngII-dependent activation when substituted into the AT1 receptor. Surprisingly, the chimeric AT1/AT2 receptors--which also lack these crucial AT1 residues--exhibited AngII-induced activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis with efficacies and potencies similar to the wild-type AT1 receptor. Consistent with earlier reports, a AT1[Y292F] point mutant demonstrated greatly decreased agonist-induced activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis. However, a AT1[Y292F/N295S] double-point mutant allowed for normal agonist-induced activation with a pharmacodynamic profile indistinguishable from the wild-type receptor. Despite amino acid dissimilarities, the same corresponding domains and even the same residue loci in both of the AngII receptor subtypes are equally able to mediate agonist-induced receptor activation. This suggests that these corresponding domains in the AT1 and the AT2 receptors are crucial to the activation mechanism, demonstrating greater structural flexibility than previously believed regarding AT1 receptor activation and supporting the possibility of a common activation mechanism for the two receptor subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hines et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: