Why the study?
Does levosimendan infusion improve hemodynamic parameters and clinical symptoms in patients with decompensated heart failure successfully treated with fluid removal?
Does levosimendan infusion improve hemodynamic parameters and clinical symptoms in patients with decompensated heart failure successfully treated with fluid removal?
Levosimendan provides additional hemodynamic and clinical benefits in patients with decompensated heart failure who have already been successfully treated with fluid removal.
May support adjunctive levosimendan after fluid removal in decompensated HF; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
A pivotal role in treating decompensated heart failure (HF) is played by inotropes and calcium sensitizers such as levosimendan. In this study, the authors evaluated whether levosimendan could determine further clinical and hemodynamic benefits in 31 HF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV), after successful treatment with diuretics (n=15) or ultrafiltration (n=16). Systolic, diastolic, dicrotic, and mean arterial pressures; systemic vascular resistance (SVR); some classic hemodynamic variables (cardiac output [CO], stroke volume [SV], dP/dt(max) ); and indices of cardiovascular system performance (cardiac cycle efficiency [CCE], cardiac power output) have been assessed by the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM), a minimally invasive monitoring system, before levosimendan infusion, at the end of treatment (EoT), and 36 hours after EoT (post-36). A significant increase in CCE, CO, SV, and dP/dt(max) and a significant decrease in diastolic and dicrotic arterial pressures and in SVR have been observed at EoT and at post-36. After the addition of levosimendan, a further reduction in signs and symptoms of HF and NYHA class was observed. Five patients showed an opposite trend of several hemodynamic parameters without any significant clinical improvement (nonresponders). In conclusion, most HF patients treated with diuretics or ultrafiltration receive additional clinical and hemodynamic benefits from levosimendan. The characterization of nonresponders could help in optimizing its use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giglioli et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: