RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A radiologist often wishes to measure organ volume or monitor changes in internal lesion volume during treatment. If this can be determined via three-dimensional ultrasound, the relative simplicity of the procedure and the decreased cost and known risks to the patient would make this method an attractive alternative to other modalities. METHODS: Three-dimensional ultrasound scans were made of six phantoms: four nonechogenic spheres, one echogenic sphere, and one echogenic, irregularly shaped phantom. A total of 22 volume scans were produced. Volume estimations were made using data from cross-sectional areas and from linear measurements. In all, 193 volume estimations were made. These results were compared with known volumes and with volume estimates from computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Three-dimensional ultrasound detected size differences of 10% with 95% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and precision of volume estimates via three-dimensional ultrasound is at least as good as those obtained via conventional ultrasound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: