Key result
Instrumental activities of daily living, age, living situation, and information transfer explained 58.7% of the variance in quality of life among patients with coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Coronary heart disease requires complex continuity of care, and quality of life is an important healthcare outcome whose general status and key predictors needed evaluation.
What are the predictors of quality of life and its correlation with continuity of care in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=163)
What are the predictors of quality of life and its correlation with continuity of care in patients with coronary heart disease?
Instrumental activities of daily living and age are significant predictors of quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease, highlighting the need for individualized continuity of care.
May inform supportive strategies in CHD; leaves open causality and requires prospective validation.
Background: As coronary heart disease (CHD) is a highly complex disease, complex continuity of care (CoC) service should be provided for the patients, and the quality of life (QoL) needs to be regarded as an important measuring indicator for the health-care outcome. Purpose: To understand the general situation of CHD QoL and important predictors. Method: A cross-sectional study design was adopted from August 2019 to July 2020 by structured questionnaires. A total of 163 patients were enrolled, and data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Result: The average score of the QoL questionnaire is 56.56/80, and the CoC is 4.32. The overall regression model can explain 58.7% of the variance regarding QoL. Patients’ instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (26.1%), age (18.1%), living situation (7%), information transfer (4.8%), main source of income (1.8%), and risk of disability are significantly different from their overall QoL in depression (0.9%). Conclusions: In order to improve the QoL of patients, it is suggested that medical teams should assess the needs of patients immediately upon hospitalization, provide patients with individual CoC, encourage them to participate in community health promotion activities, and strengthen the function of IADL to improve the QoL of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pai et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary Heart Disease (n=163). Continuity of care and patient characteristics was evaluated on Quality of Life (QoL). Instrumental activities of daily living, age, living situation, and information transfer explained 58.7% of the variance in quality of life among patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: