Key result
Problem-based learning did not significantly improve patient empowerment compared to home-sent patient information at one year in patients with coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Although cardiac rehabilitation is effective after CHD, risk factors remain and patients fear recurrence, prompting evaluation of problem-based learning versus home-sent information on patient empowerment and self-care.
Does problem-based learning improve patient empowerment and self-care in patients with coronary heart disease compared to home-sent patient information?
RCT (n=157)
Open-label
1:1 ratio via sealed opaque envelopes in blocks of 18
Yes
Does problem-based learning improve patient empowerment and self-care in patients with coronary heart disease compared to home-sent patient information?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 3.7%
p-value: p=0.543
While problem-based learning did not significantly improve patient empowerment compared to home-sent information, it led to modest but significant improvements in weight loss, BMI, and HDL cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease.
Problem-based learning offers no empowerment advantage over mailed information in CHD; leaves open whether RCTs would alter this null result.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation is effective after coronary heart disease (CHD). However, risk factors remain, and patients report fear for recurrence during recovery. Problem-based learning is a pedagogical method, where patients work self-directed in small groups with problem solving of real-life situations to manage CHD risk factors and self-care. We aimed to demonstrate the better effectiveness of problem-based learning over home-sent patient information for evaluating long-term effects of patient empowerment and self-care in patients with CHD. Hypothesis tested: One year of problem-based learning improves patients' empowerment- and self-efficacy, to change self-care compared to 1 year of standardised home-sent patient information after CHD. METHODS: Patients (N = 157) from rural and urban areas in Sweden between 2011 and 2015 (78% male; age. 68 ± 8.5 years) with CHD verified by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (70.1%) or coronary artery by-pass surgery (CABG) and CABG+PCI or myocardial infarction (29.9%) were randomly assigned to problem-based learning (experimental group; n = 79) or home-sent patient information (controls; n = 78). The problem-based learning intervention consisted of patient education in primary care by nurses tutoring groups of 6-9 patients on 13 occasions over 1 year. Controls received home-sent patient information on 11 occasions during the study year. RESULTS: At one-year follow-up, the primary outcome, patient empowerment, did not significantly differ between the experimental group and controls. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding the secondary outcomes e.g. self-efficacy, although we found significant differences for body mass index (BMI) [- 0.17 (SD 1.5) vs. 0.50 (SD 1.6), P = 0.033], body weight [- 0.83 (SD) 4.45 vs. 1.14 kg (SD 4.85), P = 0.026] and HDL cholesterol [0.1 (SD 0.7) vs. 0.0 mmol/L (SD 0.3), P = 0.038] favouring the experimental group compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: The problem-based learning- and the home-sent patient information interventions had similar results regarding patient empowerment, self-efficacy, and well-being. However, problem-based learning exhibited significant effects on weight loss, BMI, and HDL cholesterol levels, indicating that this intervention positively affected risk factors compared to the home-sent patient information. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01462799 (February 2020).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köhler et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=157). Problem-based learning vs. Home-sent patient information was evaluated on Patient empowerment (assessed by the Swedish-Coronary Empowerment Scale 10) (p=0.543). Problem-based learning did not significantly improve patient empowerment compared to home-sent patient information at one year in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: