Key result
A serum metabolite panel comprising isoleucine, tryptophan, and linoleic acid accurately distinguished cardiac resynchronization therapy responders from non-responders (AUC 0.981 in discovery set).
Why the study?
Approximately one-third of patients do not respond to CRT, and there are currently no specific biomarkers to predict CRT response in heart failure.
Does a serum metabolomic profile predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure?
Observational (n=105)
Does a serum metabolomic profile predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure?
A specific serum metabolite panel (isoleucine, tryptophan, linoleic acid) demonstrates high accuracy in predicting echocardiographic response to CRT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
A 3-metabolite panel distinguished CRT responders in DCM; leaves open prospective validation before guiding selection.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure is associated with ventricular dyssynchrony and energetic inefficiency, which can be alleviated by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with approximately one-third of non-response rate. Thus far, there is no specific biomarker to predict the response to CRT in patients with heart failure. In this study, we assessed the role of the blood metabolomic profile in predicting the response to CRT. METHODS: A total of 105 dilated cardiomyopathy patients with severe heart failure who received CRT were included in our two-stage study. Baseline blood samples were collected prior to CRT implantation. The response to CRT was defined according to echocardiographic criteria. Metabolomic profiling of serum samples was carried out using ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Seventeen metabolites showed significant differences in their levels between responders and non-responders, and these metabolites were primarily involved in six pathways, including linoleic acid metabolism, Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, citrate cycle, tryptophan metabolism, and sphingolipid metabolism. A combination of isoleucine, tryptophan, and linoleic acid was identified as an ideal metabolite panel to distinguish responders from non-responders in the discovery set (n = 51 with an AUC of 0.981), and it was confirmed in the validation set (n = 54 with an AUC of 0.929). CONCLUSIONS: Mass spectrometry based serum metabolomics approach provided larger coverage of metabolome which can help distinguish CRT responders from non-responders. A combination of isoleucine, tryptophan, and linoleic acid may associate with significant prognostic values for CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy with severe heart failure (n=105). Serum metabolite panel (isoleucine, tryptophan, and linoleic acid) was evaluated on Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (AUC 0.981 (discovery set); AUC 0.929 (validation set)). A serum metabolite panel comprising isoleucine, tryptophan, and linoleic acid accurately distinguished cardiac resynchronization therapy responders from non-responders (AUC 0.981 in discovery set).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: