Key result
Upright upper-trunk Fowler's position attenuates stroke volume drops and tachycardic responses versus whole-trunk inclination.
Why the study?
Does an upright upper trunk during Fowler's position improve stroke volume and heart rate compared to an upright whole trunk in older and younger subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=22)
Open-label
Crossover with random order of Fowler's positions
No
Does an upright upper trunk during Fowler's position improve stroke volume and heart rate compared to an upright whole trunk in older and younger subjects?
An upright upper trunk during Fowler's position helps maintain stroke volume and inhibits tachycardic responses compared to an upright whole trunk, which may reduce orthostatic stress in frail patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support upper-trunk elevation in Fowler's for hemodynamic stability in older adults; leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Downward shifts in blood volume with changing position generally cause tachycardic responses. Age-related decreases in vagal nerve activity could contribute to orthostatic hypotension in older individuals. Fowler's position is a reclined position with the back between 30° and 60°, used to facilitate breathing, eating, and other routine daily activities in frail and elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether stroke volume (SV) was higher and heart rate (HR) lower in Fowler's position with an upright upper trunk than in Fowler's position with the whole trunk upright in both older and younger subjects, based on the assumption that lower HR would result from reduced sympathetic activation in older individuals. METHODS: We assessed hemodynamics and HR variability from electrocardiography, noninvasive arterial pressure and impedance cardiography in 11 younger male subjects (age range, 20-22 years) and 11 older male subjects (age range, 64-79 years), using three positions: supine, or Fowler's positions with either 30° of lower trunk inclination and 60° of upper trunk inclination (UT60) or 60° of whole trunk inclination (WT60). Comparisons were then made between age groups and between positions. RESULTS: Reductions in SV and tachycardic response were smaller with UT60 than with WT60, in both younger and older subjects. In addition, reduced tachycardic response with upright upper trunk appeared attributable to decreased vagal withdrawal in younger subjects and to reduced sympathetic activation in older subjects. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that an upright upper trunk during Fowler's position allowed maintenance of SV and inhibited tachycardic response compared to an upright whole trunk regardless of age, although the autonomic mechanisms underlying tachycardic responses differed between younger and older adults. An upright upper trunk in Fowler's position might help to reduce orthostatic stress and facilitate routine activities and conversation in frail patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubota et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Orthostatic stress in healthy younger and older men (n=22). Fowler's position with upright upper trunk (30° lower trunk and 60° upper trunk inclination, UT60) vs. Fowler's position with upright whole trunk (60° whole trunk inclination, WT60) and supine position was evaluated on Change in stroke volume (ΔSV) and heart rate (ΔHR) from supine position (Reported here for older subjects: ΔSV in mL) (p=<0.05). Fowler's position with an upright upper trunk (UT60) attenuated stroke volume reductions and tachycardic responses compared to whole trunk inclination (WT60) in younger and older men (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: