Key result
Low starting plasma refill rate was associated with an increased hazard of intradialytic hypotension (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.18-1.35), while a consistently high rate increased short-term risk.
Why the study?
Attaining optimal balance between adequate volume removal and preserving organ perfusion during hemodialysis is challenging, and current ultrafiltration strategies are inadequate.
Is plasma refill rate associated with intradialytic hypotension in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis?
Cohort (n=2,554)
Yes
Is plasma refill rate associated with intradialytic hypotension in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis?
Hazard Ratio: 1.26 (95% CI 1.18–1.35)
Monitoring plasma refill rate dynamics during hemodialysis may help predict and understand intradialytic hypotension, offering a potential tool to improve hemodynamic stability.
May support PRR monitoring to anticipate IDH in hemodialysis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Key Points Directly studying plasma refill rate (PRR) during hemodialysis (HD) can offer insight into physiologic mechanisms that change throughout HD. PRR at the start and during HD is associated with intradialytic hypotension, independent of ultrafiltration rate. A rising PRR during HD may be an early indicator of compensatory mechanisms for impending circulatory instability. Background Attaining the optimal balance between achieving adequate volume removal while preserving organ perfusion is a challenge for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Current strategies to guide ultrafiltration are inadequate. Methods We developed an approach to calculate the plasma refill rate (PRR) throughout HD using hematocrit and ultrafiltration data in a retrospective cohort of patients receiving maintenance HD at 17 dialysis units from January 2017 to October 2019. We studied whether ( 1 ) PRR is associated with traditional risk factors for hemodynamic instability using logistic regression, ( 2 ) low starting PRR is associated with intradialytic hypotension (IDH) using Cox proportional hazard regression, and ( 3 ) time-varying PRR throughout HD is associated with hypotension using marginal structural modeling. Results During 180,319 HD sessions among 2554 patients, PRR had high within-patient and between-patient variability. Female sex and hypoalbuminemia were associated with low PRR at multiple time points during the first hour of HD. Low starting PRR has a higher hazard of IDH, whereas high starting PRR was protective (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.35 versus HR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.85, respectively). However, when accounting for time-varying PRR and time-varying confounders, compared with a moderate PRR, while a consistently low PRR was associated with increased risk of hypotension (odds ratio [OR], 1.09, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.16), a consistently high PRR had a stronger association with hypotension within the next 15 minutes (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.45). Conclusions We present a straightforward technique to quantify plasma refill that could easily integrate with devices that monitor hematocrit during HD. Our study highlights how examining patterns of plasma refill may enhance our understanding of circulatory changes during HD, an important step to understand how current technology might be used to improve hemodynamic instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Maintenance hemodialysis (n=2,554). Low starting plasma refill rate (PRR) vs. High starting PRR / Moderate PRR was evaluated on Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35). Low starting plasma refill rate was associated with an increased hazard of intradialytic hypotension (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.18-1.35), while a consistently high rate increased short-term risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: