Key result
Preoperative atenolol in dogs with pulmonic stenosis did not significantly reduce ventricular ectopic complexes (median 535 vs 553, P=0.9) or procedure time compared to no treatment.
Why the study?
Beta-blockade is sometimes used in dogs with pulmonic stenosis to reduce ventricular arrhythmias during right heart catheterization, but whether preoperative atenolol reduces arrhythmias, anesthetist interventions, or procedure time remained uncertain.
Does preoperative atenolol reduce the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias or procedure time in dogs with pulmonic stenosis undergoing interventional procedures?
RCT (n=30)
open-label
randomized
No
Does preoperative atenolol reduce the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias or procedure time in dogs with pulmonic stenosis undergoing interventional procedures?
p-value: p=0.9
Preoperative atenolol does not reduce the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias or procedure time in dogs with pulmonic stenosis undergoing interventional procedures.
Atenolol pretreatment offers no procedural benefit in dogs with pulmonic stenosis; leaves open questions on arrhythmia prevention in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Beta-blockade is sometimes used in dogs with pulmonic stenosis with the intent of reducing frequency of ventricular arrhythmias during right heart catheterization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if pretreatment with atenolol reduces frequency of ventricular arrhythmias, anesthetist interventions, or shortens procedure time. ANIMALS: Thirty dogs with pulmonic stenosis scheduled for interventional procedures. METHODS: Single center, prospective, randomized, open-label study. Dogs were randomized to treatment with atenolol or no treatment preoperatively for a minimum of 10 days. Variables recorded included heart rate, arrhythmias and complexity, total procedure time and administration of antiarrhythmic treatment, vasopressors, positive chronotropes, or fluid boluses. RESULTS: Fifteen dogs were enrolled in each group. Dogs receiving atenolol had lower mean heart rates during the procedure (atenolol 100 ± 11 bpm vs untreated 115 ± 19 bpm, P = .01). There were no significant differences between the atenolol and untreated groups in the frequency of ventricular ectopic complexes (535 [6-5296] vs 553 [79-2863], P = .9), ventricular couplets (46 [0-481] vs 29 [3-121], P = .59), ventricular triplets (20 [0-265] vs 16 [1-82], P = .67), ventricular tachycardia (8 [0-224] vs 8 [1-118], P = .99), proportion exhibiting R-on-T phenomenon (11/15 vs 14/15, P = .33), proportion receiving intraoperative lidocaine (1/15 vs 3/15, P = .6), vasopressors/positive chronotropes (11/15 vs 5/15, P = .06), or fluid boluses (12/15 vs 7/15, P = .13). The procedure time was similar (atenolol 41 [23-68] min vs untreated 35 [18-98] min, P = .91). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: No benefit of preoperative atenolol treatment was identified in this small group of dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomart et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in pulmonic stenosis (n=30). atenolol vs. no treatment was evaluated on frequency of ventricular ectopic complexes (p=0.9). Preoperative atenolol in dogs with pulmonic stenosis did not significantly reduce ventricular ectopic complexes (median 535 vs 553, P=0.9) or procedure time compared to no treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: