Why the study?
Do beta-blockers with varying intrinsic sympathomimetic activity affect atrioventricular conduction and heart rate in unanaesthetized dogs?
Do beta-blockers with varying intrinsic sympathomimetic activity affect atrioventricular conduction and heart rate in unanaesthetized dogs?
In unanaesthetized dogs, resting sympathetic tone is absent, meaning beta-blockers only depress AV conduction and heart rate when sympathetic tone is artificially elevated or when intrinsic sympathomimetic activity masks the blockade.
Context-dependent beta-blocker effects in dogs caution against assuming uniform resting actions; leaves open human translation requiring sympathetic tone assessment.
1 Atrio-ventricular conduction (AVC) in the unanaesthetized dog (17 animals) was studied using atrial pacing at progressively increasing frequencies applied via electrodes implanted in the right atrium. In animals habituated to the experimental conditions, beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) modified neither heart-rate (HR) nor AVC, though 4 mg/kg i.v. propranolol transiently raised HR and facilitated AVC. Due to their ISA, pindolol and oxprenolol raised HR and facilitated AVC at high doses. 2 Thus, when not under anaesthesia, the resting dog, in contrast to man, possesses no tonic adrenergic influence which might be suppressed by beta-adrenoceptor blockings drugs. 3 After atropine or pentobarbitone, which considerably increased HR, beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects became clearly visible, and the hitherto reported depressant effects on HR and AVC were observed. However, the ISA of oxprenolol, and especially of pindolol, can partly or completely mask their beta-adrenoceptor blocking action at high doses under these experimental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kantelip et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: