Key result
Biventricular pacing significantly increased microvolt T-wave alternans voltage (2.44 vs 0.36 μV, P<0.01) and alternans ratio compared to right ventricular pacing in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Does biventricular pacing increase microvolt T-wave alternans compared to right ventricular pacing in patients with heart failure undergoing CRT?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does biventricular pacing increase microvolt T-wave alternans compared to right ventricular pacing in patients with heart failure undergoing CRT?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.44% vs 0.36%
p-value: p=<0.01
Biventricular pacing significantly increases microvolt T-wave alternans voltage and ratio compared to right ventricular pacing, suggesting a potential proarrhythmic effect in CRT patients.
Biventricular pacing was associated with higher microvolt T-wave alternans; hypothesis-generating for proarrhythmic risk in CRT and requires prospective confirmation.
Objective: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to be effective for left ventricular dysfunction associated with left bundle branch block. However, CRT does not necessarily decrease the risk of sudden cardiac death. Recent studies have shown that epicardial left ventricular pacing may lead to prolongation of the QT interval and the development of torsades de pointes. Microvolt T-wave alternans (TWA) has been associated with increased susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. We compared the influence of right atrial pacing, right ventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing (RAP, RVP, LVP and BVP) on TWA. Methods: TWA was measured per pacing mode during incremental pacing from 70 to 120 bpm in 18 CRT patients with a mean ejection fraction of 32±5%. TWA was considered positive if alternans voltage (Valt)>1.9 μV and alternans ratio (AR)>3.0 were observed for at least 1 minute. The incidence of TWA is reported as the percentage of impulse applications during which it was observed. Results: TWA was observed as follows: BVP, 73%; RVP, 50%; LVP, 60%; and RAP, 60%. Mean Valt (μV) was 2.44±0.35, 0.36±0.11, 1.44±0.65, and 1.95±0.45, respectively (P<0.01 BVP vs. RVP). Mean alternans ratio during BVP, RVP, LVP, and RAP was 8.21±2.4, 4.28±1.3, 5.66±2.3, and 7.36±2.0, respectively (P<0.05 BVP vs. RVP). Conclusion: BVP may increase the temporal inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization, which may lead to the development of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimoto et al. (2014) conducted an observational in NYHA class III/IV heart failure (n=18). Biventricular pacing vs. Right ventricular pacing was evaluated on Alternans voltage (Valt) (p=<0.01). Biventricular pacing significantly increased microvolt T-wave alternans voltage (2.44 vs 0.36 μV, P<0.01) and alternans ratio compared to right ventricular pacing in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: