Key result
Biventricular pacing significantly attenuated T-wave alternans magnitude compared to right ventricular and right atrial pacing (P<0.01), though RV-TWA better predicted death and ICD therapy.
Why the study?
Does biventricular pacing reduce T-wave alternans and T-wave amplitude compared to other pacing modes in patients receiving CRT-D?
Observational (n=33)
Does biventricular pacing reduce T-wave alternans and T-wave amplitude compared to other pacing modes in patients receiving CRT-D?
p-value: p=<0.01
Biventricular pacing attenuates T-wave alternans and T-wave amplitude compared to other pacing modes, though right ventricular T-wave alternans is a better predictor of clinical events.
Biventricular pacing was associated with attenuated TWA; leaves open whether this improves risk stratification or outcomes versus RV-TWA in CRT-D candidates.
BACKGROUND: The impact of altered ventricular activation, including biventricular (BV) pacing, on T-wave alternans (TWA) and arrhythmic substrates is unclear. We studied how differing ventricular activation sequence alters TWA; the interval from peak-to-end of the T-wave (TpTe) and T-wave amplitude during right (RV), left (LV), and biventricular (BV) pacing; and right atrial (RA) pacing in patients with preexisting conduction delay. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured TWA during RA, RV, LV, and BV pacing in 33 patients receiving cardiac-resynchronization-therapy-defibrillators. TWA magnitude (V(alt)) was lower during BV than RV (P < 0.01), RA (P < 0.01), or LV pacing. As a result, BV-TWA was more often negative than RV-TWA (P < 0.01), LV-TWA, and RA-TWA, particularly when discordant between pacing modes (P < 0.01). Overall, 83% of TWA recordings were abnormal (25% indeterminate), and 17% negative. BV pacing reduced T-wave amplitude (P < 0.05) and TpTe (P < 0.005) compared to RV pacing and LV pacing (P < 0.05; P < 0.005 respectively). Notably, TWA magnitude varied linearly with T-wave amplitude for all pacing modes (P < 0.001). Over 410 +/- 252 days' follow-up, RV-TWA predicted the combined endpoint of death and ICD therapy with 86% negative predictive value (P < 0.05). BV-TWA, RA-TWA, and other repolarization indices were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: BV pacing attenuates TWA in tandem with reduced T-wave magnitude. In these patients with baseline QRS prolongation, RV-TWA predicted events more effectively than BV-TWA and RA-TWA. Further studies are required to understand how altered ventricular activation influences repolarization dynamics and arrhythmic tendency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anh et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Preexisting conduction delay requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=33). Biventricular (BV) pacing vs. Right ventricular (RV), left ventricular (LV), and right atrial (RA) pacing was evaluated on T-wave alternans (TWA) magnitude (p=<0.01). Biventricular pacing significantly attenuated T-wave alternans magnitude compared to right ventricular and right atrial pacing (P<0.01), though RV-TWA better predicted death and ICD therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: