Key result
Clonidine and Rilmenidine attenuated pressor responses to psychogenic stimuli in hypertensive rats, with Rilmenidine providing greater cardioprotection by reducing air-jet-induced tachycardia.
Why the study?
Clonidine and rilmenidine are commonly prescribed centrally acting antihypertensives, but their comparative effects on psychogenic cardiovascular reactivity during neurogenic hypertension required evaluation.
Does clonidine or rilmenidine reduce psychogenic cardiovascular reactivity to sensory stimuli in normotensive and hypertensive rats?
Does clonidine or rilmenidine reduce psychogenic cardiovascular reactivity to sensory stimuli in normotensive and hypertensive rats?
Centrally acting antihypertensives clonidine and rilmenidine attenuate psychogenic cardiovascular reactivity in hypertensive rats, with rilmenidine offering additional chronotropic benefits.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rat data on central antihypertensives and stress reactivity remain preliminary; leaves open human translation and comparative trials.
Clonidine (CL) and Rilmenidine (RI) are among the most frequently prescribed centrally acting antihypertensives. Here, we compared CL and RI effects on psychogenic cardiovascular reactivity to sonant, luminous, motosensory, and vibrotactile stimuli during neurogenic hypertension. The femoral artery and vein of Wistar (WT - normotensive) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were catheterized before (24 h interval) i.p. injection of vehicle (NaCl 0.9%, control - CT group), CL (10 µg/kg), or RI (10 µg/kg) and acute exposure to luminous (5000 lm), sonant (75 dB sudden tap), motor (180° cage twist), and air-jet (10 L/min - restraint and vibrotactile). Findings showed that: (i) CL or RI reduced the arterial pressure of SHR, without affecting basal heart rate in WT and SHR; (ii) different stimuli evoked pressor and tachycardic responses; (iii) CL and RI reduced pressor response to sound; (iv) CL or RI reduced pressor responses to luminous stimulus without a change in peak tachycardia in SHR; (v) cage twist increased blood pressure in SHR, which was attenuated by CL or RI; (vi) air-jet increased pressure and heart rate; (vii) CL or RI attenuated the pressor responses to air-jet in SHR while RI reduced the chronotropic reactivity in both strains. Altogether, both antihypertensives relieved the psychogenic cardiovascular responses to different stimuli. The RI elicited higher cardioprotective effects through a reduction in air-jet-induced tachycardia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendonça et al. (2021) studied Neurogenic hypertension. Clonidine and Rilmenidine vs. Vehicle (NaCl 0.9%) was evaluated on Psychogenic cardiovascular reactivity (pressor and tachycardic responses). Clonidine and Rilmenidine attenuated pressor responses to psychogenic stimuli in hypertensive rats, with Rilmenidine providing greater cardioprotection by reducing air-jet-induced tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: