Key result
Active cycling and routine physiotherapy significantly increased median heart rate from 76 bpm at rest to 93 bpm during cycling among patients in the sub-acute phase post-brain injury (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does active cycling and routine physiotherapy alter heart rate and heart rate variability in patients post-brain-injury in the sub-acute phase?
Observational (n=25)
Does active cycling and routine physiotherapy alter heart rate and heart rate variability in patients post-brain-injury in the sub-acute phase?
Absolute Event Rate: 93% vs 76%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Physiotherapy significantly increases heart rate in sub-acute brain injury patients, with distinct autonomic responses observed between stroke and traumatic brain injury cohorts, highlighting the need for routine monitoring.
Supports HR monitoring during physiotherapy in subacute brain injury; hypothesis-generating for etiology-specific autonomic responses and outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To assess cardiovascular autonomic nervous system function of patients post-brain-injury in the sub-acute phase during a physiotherapy session (PTS). PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen patients post-ischaemic stroke and 11 post-severe traumatic brain injuries. INTERVENTION: Continuous electrocardiogram recording at rest, during active cycling and during routine PTS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Heart rate (HR) and Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters included the standard deviation of all R-R intervals (SDNN), the square root of the mean squared differences of successive differences (RMSSD), the Low-frequency (LF) power, High-frequency (HF) power and the LF/HF ratio. RESULTS: The median HR at rest was 76 bpm (interquartile range 61-81). Significant increments were noted during activities; median HR during cycling was 93 bpm, during the most intense activity 91 bpm (p-value < 0.001). A significant decline in HRV parameters' median values during cycling and PTS was observed only among patients post-stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients post-brain injury, HR increased significantly during PTS in different activities and varied positions; therefore, therapists should be aware and monitor HR frequently during training. In addition, HRV values were low at rest and did not respond to activity among patients post-TBI, compared with higher values at rest and some response among patients post-stroke. This may indicate that autonomic impairment post-brain insult is more likely a consequence of central nervous system damage and less likely a result of pre-event cardiovascular illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katz‐Leurer et al. (2013) conducted an observational in post-brain-injury in the sub-acute phase (n=25). Active cycling and routine physiotherapy session vs. Rest was evaluated on Heart rate (HR) (p=< 0.001). Active cycling and routine physiotherapy significantly increased median heart rate from 76 bpm at rest to 93 bpm during cycling among patients in the sub-acute phase post-brain injury (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: