Key result
A new formula for estimating LDL-C was more accurate than the Friedewald formula in Chinese subjects with total cholesterol between 2.58 and 7.74 mmol/L.
Why the study?
Does a new formula improve the accuracy of LDL-C estimation compared to the Friedewald formula in an ethnic Chinese population?
Cross-Sectional (n=21,689)
Does a new formula improve the accuracy of LDL-C estimation compared to the Friedewald formula in an ethnic Chinese population?
A new, simple formula based only on total cholesterol provides more accurate LDL-C estimation than the Friedewald formula in ethnic Chinese individuals with total cholesterol between 2.58 and 7.74 mmol/L.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support refined LDL-C estimation in Chinese subjects; leaves open outcome validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is usually estimated by the Friedewald formula (FF) calculated from three parameters, namely, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). We aimed to develop a new and simple formula (NF) for LDL-C estimation. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled two study populations (a testing group, n=16,749, and a validation group, n=4940). Linear regression analysis was used in the testing group to investigate the association between measured LDL-C (mLDL-C) and TC concentration, and was verified in the validation group. RESULTS: The NF yielded an estimated LDL-C (eLDL-C) equal to 0.75 × total cholesterol-0.6465 (mmol/L). For the subjects with TC between 2.58 and 7.74 mmol/L, the difference between mLDL-C and eLDL-C using the NF was less than that from the FF (testing group: -0.04 to -0.20 vs. -0.28 to -0.38 mmol/L; validation group: 0.01 to -0.12 vs. -0.23 to -0.30 mmol/L; p<0.001, respectively). The predictability of the NF was not inferior to that of the FF in subjects with different triglyceride and HDL-C concentrations, and was not affected by diabetes diagnosis and statin use. However, the NF performed similar to or worse than the FF at TC concentrations <2.58 mmol/L and >7.74 mmol/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the Chinese population, the accuracy of eLDL-C measurement with the NF was better than that with the FF, especially in subjects with TC levels between 2.58 and 7.74 mmol/L. The NF is simple and may be used for screening as well as for follow-up of patients on lipid lowering agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) estimation (n=21,689). New formula (NF) for LDL-C estimation vs. Friedewald formula (FF) was evaluated on Difference between measured LDL-C and estimated LDL-C for subjects with TC between 2.58 and 7.74 mmol/L (p=<0.001). A new formula for estimating LDL-C was more accurate than the Friedewald formula in Chinese subjects with total cholesterol between 2.58 and 7.74 mmol/L.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: