Why the study?
Does muscle metaboreflex activation modulate the arterial baroreflex dynamic effects on peripheral vascular conductance in healthy humans?
Does muscle metaboreflex activation modulate the arterial baroreflex dynamic effects on peripheral vascular conductance in healthy humans?
Muscle metaboreflex activation modulates the arterial baroreflex control of peripheral vascular conductance in humans, augmenting vasoconstrictor responses and blunting vasodilator responses.
Supports metaboreflex-baroreflex interaction on vascular conductance in healthy humans; leaves open clinical relevance for exercise recovery or patient assessment.
We aimed to investigate the interaction between the arterial baroreflex and muscle metaboreflex [as reflected by alterations in the dynamic responses shown by leg blood flow (LBF: by the ultrasound Doppler method), leg vascular conductance (LVC), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR)] in humans. In 12 healthy subjects (10 men and 2 women), who performed sustained 1-min handgrip exercise at 50% maximal voluntary contraction followed immediately by an imposed postexercise muscle ischemia (PEMI), 5-s periods of neck pressure (NP; 50 mmHg) or neck suction (NS; -60 mmHg) were used to evaluate carotid baroreflex function both at rest (Con) and during PEMI. First, the decreases in LVC and LBF and the augmentation of MAP elicited by NP were all greater during PEMI than in Con (DeltaLVC, -1.2 +/- 0.2 vs. -1.9 +/- 0.2 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); DeltaLBF, -97.3 +/- 11.2 vs. -177.0 +/- 21.8 ml/min; DeltaMAP, 6.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 11.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg, Con vs. PEMI; each P < 0.05). Second, in Con, NS significantly increased both LVC and LBF (DeltaLVC, 0.9 +/- 0.2 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); DeltaLBF, 46.6 +/- 9.8 ml/min; significant change from baseline: each P < 0.05), and, whereas during PEMI no significant increases in LVC and LBF occurred during NS itself (DeltaLVC, 0.2 +/- 0.1 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); DeltaLBF, 10.8 +/- 9.6 ml/min; each P > 0.05), a decrease was evident in each parameters at 5 s after the cessation of NS. Third, during PEMI, the decrease in MAP elicited by NS was smaller (DeltaMAP, -8.4 +/- 1.0 vs. -5.8 +/- 0.4 mmHg, Con vs. PEMI; P < 0.05), and it recovered to its initial level more quickly after NS (vs. Con). Finally, however, the HR responses to NS and NP were not different between PEMI and Con. These results suggest that during muscle metaboreflex activation in humans, the arterial baroreflex dynamic effect on peripheral vascular conductance is modulated, as exemplified by 1) an augmentation of the NP-induced LVC decrease, and 2) a loss of the NS-induced LVC increase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichinose et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: