Key result
African Americans with CAC ≥400 show ~16-fold higher 10-year mortality risk versus non-Hispanic whites.
Why the study?
Disparities in heart disease case fatality rates among ethnic groups are well known, potentially reflecting differing pathophysiological mechanisms and effects of underlying atherosclerosis.
Does coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring predict all-cause mortality differently across ethnic groups in a diverse patient cohort?
Cohort (n=14,812)
Does coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring predict all-cause mortality differently across ethnic groups in a diverse patient cohort?
Relative Risk: 16.1
p-value: p=<0.0001
African Americans with a high burden of subclinical coronary artery disease (CAC ≥400) have a substantially higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to other ethnic groups.
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of coronary artery calcium (CAC), a known marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, in a large, ethnically diverse cohort of 14,812 patients for the prediction of all-cause mortality. BACKGROUND Disparities in case fatality rates for heart disease among ethnic groups are well known. In 2001, rates of death from heart disease were 30% higher among African Americans (AA) than non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Some of this variability may be due to differing pathophysiological mechanisms and effects of underlying atherosclerosis. METHODS Ten-year death rates from all causes (total deaths = 505) were compared using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models in AA (n = 637), Hispanic (HS, n = 1,334), Asian (AS, n = 1,065), and NHW (n = 11,776) populations. RESULTS Ethnic minority patients were generally younger (0.3 to 4 years), more often persons with diabetes (p < 0.0001), hypertensive (p < 0.0001), and female (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of CAC scores > or =100 was highest in NHW (31%) and lowest for HS (18%) (p < 0.0001). Overall survival was 96%, 93%, and 92% for AS, NHW, and HS, respectively, as compared with 83% for AA (p < 0.0001). When comparing prognosis by CAC scores in ethnic minorities as compared with NHW, relative risk ratios were highest for AA with CAC scores > or =400 exceeding 16.1 (p < 0.0001). Hispanics with CAC scores > or =400 had relative risk ratios from 7.9 to 9.0, whereas AS with CAC scores > or =1,000 had relative risk ratios 6.6-fold higher than NHW (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Consistent with population evidence, AA with increasing burden of subclinical coronary artery disease were the highest-risk ethnic minority population. These data support a growing body of evidence noting substantial differences in cardiovascular risk by ethnicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasir et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=14,812). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score vs. Non-Hispanic whites (NHW) was evaluated on 10-year all-cause mortality (RR >16.1, p=<0.0001). African Americans with coronary artery calcium scores ≥400 had a >16.1-fold higher relative risk of 10-year all-cause mortality compared to non-Hispanic whites (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: