Why the study?
What are the clinical risk factors for peri-operative stroke complicating carotid endarterectomy?
What are the clinical risk factors for peri-operative stroke complicating carotid endarterectomy?
In a prospective audit of 1000 carotid endarterectomies, traditional clinical risk factors did not significantly predict overall peri-operative stroke, though female gender increased the risk of stroke due to operative site thrombosis.
Traditional risk factors may not predict peri-operative stroke after carotid endarterectomy; leaves open female-specific thrombosis mechanisms for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of potential clinical risk factors in the causation of peri-operative stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy. With the change in carotid endarterectomy practice from the use of a shunt to high-dose thiopental for cerebral protection (a previously undocumented method), it was essential to identify accurately the causes of all perioperative strokes. METHODS: A prospective audit was undertaken of 1000 carotid endarterectomies in which the causes and pathology of all peri-operative strokes were documented. The roles of advanced age, female gender, hypertension, previous stroke, contralateral carotid stenosis >70%, and contralateral carotid occlusion as potential causes of peri-operative stroke were defined. Results were statistically analysed using odds ratio and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: None of the potential risk factors was statistically significant for peri-operative stroke. Female gender was associated with a significant risk of peri-operative stroke due to operative site thrombosis. Complications at the endarterectomy site were the commonest cause of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective audit is a useful tool for identifying causes of peri-operative stroke and indicating the need for modifications to surgical clinical management which might improve outcomes for carotid endarterectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frawley et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: