Key result
Unrecognized heart failure was present in 43% of patients with atrial fibrillation versus 19.7% without, and NTproBNP testing at a 125 pg/mL cut-point had poor specificity (35%) in this population.
Why the study?
Does NTproBNP testing accurately detect previously unknown heart failure in community-dwelling patients with atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,941)
Yes
Does NTproBNP testing accurately detect previously unknown heart failure in community-dwelling patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 19.7%
Due to a high prevalence of unrecognized heart failure and low specificity of NTproBNP in patients with atrial fibrillation, direct echocardiography is preferred over biomarker screening.
NT-proBNP screening for unrecognized HF in AF shows limited utility; leaves open optimal community diagnostic strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Heart failure (HF) often coexists in atrial fibrillation (AF) but is frequently unrecognised due to overlapping symptomatology. Furthermore, AF can cause elevated natriuretic peptide levels, impairing its diagnostic value for HF detection. We aimed to assess the prevalence of previously unknown HF in community-dwelling patients with AF, and to determine the diagnostic value of the amino-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) for HF screening in patients with AF. METHODS: Individual participant data from four HF-screening studies in older community-dwelling persons were combined. Presence or absence of HF was in each study established by an expert panel following the criteria of the European Society of Cardiology. We performed a two-stage patient-level meta-analysis to calculate traditional diagnostic indices. RESULTS: Of the 1941 individuals included in the four studies, 196 (10.1%) had AF at baseline. HF was uncovered in 83 (43%) of these 196 patients with AF, versus 381 (19.7%) in those without AF at baseline. Median NTproBNP levels of patients with AF with and without HF were 744 pg/mL and 211 pg/mL, respectively. At the cut-point of 125 pg/mL, sensitivity was 93%, specificity 35%, and positive and negative predictive values 51% and 86%, respectively. Only 23% of all patients with AF had an NTproBNP level below the 125 pg/mL cut-point, with still a 13% prevalence of HF in this group. CONCLUSIONS: With a prevalence of nearly 50%, unrecognised HF is common among community-dwelling patients with AF. Given the high prior change, natriuretic peptides are diagnostically not helpful, and straightforward echocardiography seems to be the preferred strategy for HF screening in patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doorn et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure (n=1,941). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Unrecognized heart failure. Unrecognized heart failure was present in 43% of patients with atrial fibrillation versus 19.7% without, and NTproBNP testing at a 125 pg/mL cut-point had poor specificity (35%) in this population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: