Key result
Direct sympathetic stimulation with isoproterenol and reflex stimulation with nitroprusside significantly increased regional differences and dispersion of repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy compared to structurally normal hearts.
Why the study?
Does sympathetic stimulation (direct and reflex) increase regional dispersion of repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy compared to structurally normal hearts?
Population
10 patients total: 5 with postinfarct cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular arrhythmias referred for…
Comparison
Direct sympathetic stimulation with… vs Baseline measurements and patients with…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Suggests heightened arrhythmic vulnerability during sympathetic stress post-MI; leaves open whether modulation alters clinical events.
Does sympathetic stimulation (direct and reflex) increase regional dispersion of repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy compared to structurally normal hearts?
p-value: p=0.015
Direct and reflex sympathetic stimulation significantly increases regional repolarization heterogeneity in postinfarct cardiomyopathy, providing a mechanistic basis for ventricular arrhythmogenesis in these patients.
Vaseghi et al. (2012) studied Postinfarct cardiomyopathy (n=10). Isoproterenol and nitroprusside infusion vs. Baseline (within-patient) and structurally normal hearts was evaluated on Change in activation recovery interval (ARI) and ARI dispersion (p=0.015). Direct sympathetic stimulation with isoproterenol and reflex stimulation with nitroprusside significantly increased regional differences and dispersion of repolarization in patients with postinfarct cardiomyopathy compared to structurally normal hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: