Nitric oxide attenuates TGF-beta3 mRNA expression in cardiac fibroblasts via destabilization, providing a potential mechanism for NO to influence the progression of interstitial fibrosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical SNAP effects on rat fibroblast TGF-β3 leave clinical translation open; extends mechanistic understanding of NO in cardiac fibrosis.
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) has been implicated in the development of interstitial fibrosis in cardiac hypertrophy. NO has been regarded as a potent inhibitor of cardiac fibroblast growth, albeit the modulation of cellular events associated with interstitial fibrosis remains undefined. In this regard, the regulation of TGF-beta mRNA expression by the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (SNAP) was examined in neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts. SNAP treatment for 4 hours decreased TGF-beta(3) mRNA levels, an effect mimicked by 8-bromo-cGMP. TGF-beta(3) mRNA, however, had returned to levels observed in the untreated cells after a 24-hour exposure to SNAP, whereas a decreased expression persisted with 8-bromo-cGMP. In contrast to TGF-beta(3), TGF-beta(1) mRNA levels were modestly increased in response to cGMP-generating molecules. The treatment with actinomycin D for at least 8 hours did not appreciably alter TGF-beta(3) mRNA levels. By contrast, SNAP treatment caused a rapid decrease of TGF-beta(3) mRNA with a half-life of 3.3+/-0.2 hours, thereby supporting a mechanism of destabilization. The pretreatment with SNAP inhibited angiotensin II-stimulated protein synthesis and the concomitant expression of TGF-beta(3) mRNA. These data reveal a disparate pattern of TGF-beta(1) and TGF-beta(3) mRNA regulation by NO and highlight a novel mechanism of destabilization contributing to the decreased expression of TGF-beta(3) mRNA. The modulation of both basal and angiotensin II-stimulated TGF-beta(3) mRNA expression provides a mechanism by which NO may influence the progression of interstitial fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelaziz et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: