Key result
Aerobic exercise training improved ejection fraction (SMD 0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.61) and reversed left ventricular remodelling in clinically stable patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Does exercise training improve left ventricular remodelling in clinically stable patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=813)
Does exercise training improve left ventricular remodelling in clinically stable patients with heart failure?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.44 (95% CI 0.28–0.61)
Long-term aerobic exercise training (≥6 months) significantly improves left ventricular ejection fraction and reduces end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes in clinically stable heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports aerobic exercise as adjunctive therapy in stable HF; strengthens evidence for reverse remodeling across trials.
Chen et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=813). Aerobic exercise training vs. Control was evaluated on Ejection fraction (EF) (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.61). Aerobic exercise training improved ejection fraction (SMD 0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.61) and reversed left ventricular remodelling in clinically stable patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: