Key result
In a community-based elderly cohort, subjects with peak atrial longitudinal strain below 39% had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.499) over a median 9.5-year follow-up.
Why the study?
Data are scarce regarding the prognostic power of left atrial longitudinal strain and its potential added value for risk stratification in an elderly population.
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) predict all-cause mortality in an elderly community-based cohort?
Cohort (n=314)
No
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) predict all-cause mortality in an elderly community-based cohort?
Hazard Ratio: 2.499 (95% CI 1.334–4.682)
p-value: p=<0.05
Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) provides incremental prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality beyond traditional risk factors and LV global longitudinal strain in an elderly community-based cohort.
PALS may refine elderly mortality risk beyond GLS; leaves open incremental value pending prospective validation.
Despite the well-known importance of left atrial (LA) mechanics in diastolic function, data are scarce regarding the prognostic power of LA longitudinal strain and its potential added value in the risk stratification of an elderly population. Accordingly, our aim was to determine the long-term prognostic importance of 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) in a community-based screening sample. Three hundred and fourteen volunteers were retrospectively identified from a population-based screening program (mean age 62 ± 11 years; 58% female) with a median follow-up of 9.5 years. All subjects who participated in the screening program underwent 2D echocardiography to measure left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and PALS, as well as low-dose cardiac CT to determine the Agatston score. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Thirty-nine subjects (12.4%) met the primary endpoint. Subjects with adverse outcomes had significantly lower LV GLS (dead vs. alive; - 19.2 ± 4.3 vs. - 20.6 ± 3.5%, p < 0.05) and PALS (32.3 ± 12.0 vs. 41.8 ± 14.2%, p < 0.001), whereas LV EF did not show a difference between the two groups (51.1 ± 7.0 vs. 52.1 ± 6.2, %, p = NS). By multivariable Cox regression analysis, PALS was found to be a significant predictor of adverse outcomes independent of LV GLS, and Agatston and Framingham scores. In subjects with PALS values below the standard cut-off of 39%, the risk of all-cause mortality was almost 2.5 times higher (hazard ratio: 2.499 [95% confidence interval: 1.334-4.682], p < 0.05). Beyond the assessment of LV EF and LV GLS, PALS offers incremental value in cardiovascular risk stratification in a community-based elderly cohort. PALS was found to be a significant and independent predictor of long-term mortality among other classical cardiovascular risk estimators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakija et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in General population (community-based screening) (n=314). Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) < 39% vs. PALS ≥ 39% was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.499, 95% CI 1.334-4.682, p=<0.05). In a community-based elderly cohort, subjects with peak atrial longitudinal strain below 39% had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.499) over a median 9.5-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: