Key result
Peak atrial longitudinal strain had no independent effect on death or heart failure hospitalization after adjusting for global longitudinal strain (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.05; P=0.87).
Why the study?
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) provide independent prognostic value beyond global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=843)
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) provide independent prognostic value beyond global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) does not provide independent prognostic information beyond global longitudinal strain and left atrial volume in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Caution against using PALS for post-MI prognostication beyond GLS; leaves open its incremental value in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) during the reservoir phase has been proposed as a measure of left atrium function in a range of cardiac conditions, with the potential for added pathophysiological insight and prognostic value. However, no studies have assessed the interrelation of PALS and left ventricular longitudinal strain (global longitudinal strain) in large-scale populations in regard to prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively included 843 patients (mean age 62.1±11.8; 74% male) with acute myocardial infarction and measured global longitudinal strain, left atrium volumes, and PALS within 48 hours of admission. PALS was related to a composite outcome of death and heart failure hospitalization. Reduced PALS was associated with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and Killip class >1 (P<0.05 for all). Reduced PALS was associated with impairment of all measures of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and the correlation between global longitudinal strain and PALS was highly significant (P<0.001; r=-0.71). During follow-up (median 23.0 months Q1-Q3, 16.8-26.0), a total of 76 patients (9.0%) reached the composite end point of which 47 patients died (5.6%), and 29 patients were hospitalized for heart failure (3.4%). PALS was significantly associated with outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.90; P<0.001); however, no independent effect of PALS (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.05; P=0.87) was found when adjusting for global longitudinal strain (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.33; P<0.001), maximum left atrium volume before mitral valve opening (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P=0.006), and age (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PALS provides a composite measure of left ventricular longitudinal systolic function and maximum left atrium volume before mitral valve opening, and as such contains no added information when these readily obtained measures are known.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ersbøll et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in acute myocardial infarction (n=843). Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was evaluated on Composite outcome of death and heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.05, p=0.87). Peak atrial longitudinal strain had no independent effect on death or heart failure hospitalization after adjusting for global longitudinal strain (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.94-1.05; P=0.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: