Key result
A 5% drop in peak atrial longitudinal strain predicts ~42% higher AF risk, driven by those <65.
Why the study?
While left atrial enlargement predicts incident AF, the prognostic value of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) for predicting incident AF in the general population was unknown.
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) predict incident atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke in the general population?
Cohort (n=400)
Does peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) predict incident atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke in the general population?
Effect estimate: HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.19-1.69)
p-value: p=<0.001
In a low-risk general population, peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) provides novel prognostic information on the long-term risk of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke specifically in individuals under 65 years of age.
PALS may support AF risk stratification under age 65; leaves open incremental value beyond clinical predictors.
AIMS: Left atrial enlargement predicts incident atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the prognostic value of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) for predicting incident AF in participants from the general population is currently unknown. Our aim was to investigate if PALS can be used to predict AF and ischaemic stroke in the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 400 participants from the general population underwent a health examination, including two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography of the left atrium. The primary endpoint was incident AF at follow-up. All participants with known AF and prior stroke at baseline were excluded (n = 54). The secondary endpoint consisted of the composite of AF and ischaemic stroke. During a median follow-up of 16 years, 36 participants (9%) were diagnosed with incident AF and 30 (7%) experienced an ischaemic stroke, resulting in 66 (16%) experiencing the composite outcome. PALS was a univariable predictor of AF [per 5% decrease: hazard ratio (HR) 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.19-1.69), P < 0.001]. However, the prognostic value of PALS was modified by age (P = 0.002 for interaction). After multivariable adjustment PALS predicted AF in participants aged <65 years [per 5% decrease: HR 1.46; 95% CI (1.06-2.02), P = 0.021]. In contrast, PALS did not predict AF in participants aged ≥65 years after multivariable adjustment [per 5% decrease: HR 1.05; 95% CI (0.81-1.35), P = 0.72]. PALS also predicted the secondary endpoint in participants aged <65 years and the association remained significant after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: In a low-risk general population, PALS provides novel prognostic information on the long-term risk of AF and ischaemic stroke in participants aged <65 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alhakak et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in General population (n=400). Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.69, p=<0.001). A 5% decrease in peak atrial longitudinal strain predicted incident atrial fibrillation in the general population (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.19-1.69; P<0.001), with the effect driven by those aged <65 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: