Key result
In patients with acute myocarditis, left ventricular mass decreased during the convalescent phase compared to the acute phase, paralleling edema resolution.
Why the study?
Is the resolution of myocardial edema in healing myocarditis associated with a decrease in left ventricular mass on CMR?
Observational (n=32)
No
Is the resolution of myocardial edema in healing myocarditis associated with a decrease in left ventricular mass on CMR?
Myocardial edema in acute myocarditis causes a reversible increase in left ventricular mass that normalizes during convalescence, as detected by CMR.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports edema-driven reversible LV mass increase in acute myocarditis; hypothesis-generating for serial CMR monitoring and requires prospective validation.
Myocardial edema is a substantial feature of the inflammatory response in acute myocarditis. The relation between myocardial edema and myocardial mass over the course of myocarditis has not been systematically investigated in a clinical setting. We hypothesised that the resolution of myocardial edema in the course of healing myocarditis as visualised by T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is associated with a decrease of myocardial mass in SSFP-cine imaging. 21 patients (16 male, mean age ± SD 36.4 ± 16.1 yrs.) with acute myocarditis as defined by clinical symptoms, history, ECG-changes, rise of myocardial enzymes and exclusion of coronary artery disease on X-ray coronary angiography underwent CMR (1.5 T) at day 2.6 ± 3.1 after acute onset of symptoms and 274.3 ± 279.5 days later. For visualization of edema, a T2-weighted breath-hold black-blood triple-inversion fast spin echo technique was applied and the ratio of signal intensity of myocardium/sceletal muscle was assessed. Left ventricular (LV) mass, volumes and function were quantified from biplane cine steady state free precession images. As a control group for interstudy reproducibility of LV mass, 11 healthy volunteers (7 male, age 31.6 ± 2.8 yrs.) underwent CMR twice within one week. In the presence of acute myocarditis, the LV mass was not overt hypertrophic but still within normal values (156.7 ± 30.6 g). A significant decrease in LV mass was observed during follow-up compared to the acute phase (156.7 ± 30.6 g vs. 140.3 ± 28.3 g, p =< 0.0001, see Figures 1 and 2 ). Figure 1 In patients with myocarditis, myocardial edema and LV-mass were assessed by CMR acutely and after 9 months. The findings suggest that myocardial edema is reflected by a reversible increase in LV-mass and by high signal intensity in T2-weighted imaging. In controls, the interstudy difference of LV mass was lower than in patients (5.1 ± 2.9 g vs. 16.3 ± 14.2 g, p = 0.02) resulting in a lower coefficient of variability (2.1 vs 8.9%, p = 0.04). The reduction of LV mass in patients parallels the normalization of initially increased myocardial signal intensity on T2-weighted images (2.4 ± 0.4 vs. 1.68 ± 0.3, p =< 0.0001). In cine imaging, the left ventricular function (LV-EF) was within normal ranges in 18 patients (86%). LV-EF improved significantly in most patients at follow-up (59.9 ± 6.4% vs. 64.1 ± 5.3%, p = 0.015). Myocardial edema in the presence of acute myocarditis is reflected by a reversible increase in left ventricular mass and by high signal intensity in T2-weighted imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zagrosek et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Acute myocarditis (n=32). Healing myocarditis (convalescent phase) vs. Acute myocarditis phase was evaluated on Left ventricular mass (p=<0.0001). In patients with acute myocarditis, left ventricular mass decreased during the convalescent phase compared to the acute phase, paralleling edema resolution.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: