Key result
Successful percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions due to in-stent restenosis resulted in a 3% cardiac death rate versus 8.3% for failed procedures at 20 months (p=0.09).
Why the study?
What are the procedural success rates and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis?
Cohort (n=233)
Yes
What are the procedural success rates and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis?
Percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions due to in-stent restenosis demonstrates a high procedural success rate (82.4%) and favorable long-term clinical outcomes in contemporary practice.
Registry supports CTO-ISR PCI feasibility; leaves open need for RCTs on long-term outcomes.
AIMS: Limited data exist on the treatment and outcomes of patients with chronic total occlusions due to in-stent restenosis (CTO-ISR). We sought to evaluate results and clinical outcomes in percutaneous interventions over CTO-ISR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a registry in 16 centres involving consecutive patients undergoing attempted percutaneous intervention over CTO-ISR. A total of 233 patients were included, 192 (82.4%) with a successful acute result. The success rate was significantly lower in patients with: lesion in the circumflex artery, ostial lesions, J score >3 and no femoral access. The presence of tandem lesions (OR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.68; p=0.01) was identified as an independent predictor for outcome. After a median follow-up of 20 months, cardiac death in the successful vs. failed groups was 3% and 8.3%, respectively (p=0.09). Independent predictors for mortality were previous CABG (HR 8, 95% CI: 1.3-50; p=0.02) and multivessel disease (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.3; p=0.01). In the successful group, TLR was 15%, re-occlusion 6% and definite/probable stent thrombosis 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous treatment of CTO due to ISR in contemporary practice shows a high success rate, resulting in good long-term results. The angiographic and procedural predictors identified may contribute to improving procedural outcome through better patient selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Chronic total occlusions due to in-stent restenosis (CTO-ISR) (n=233). Successful percutaneous intervention vs. Failed percutaneous intervention was evaluated on Cardiac death (p=0.09). Successful percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions due to in-stent restenosis resulted in a 3% cardiac death rate versus 8.3% for failed procedures at 20 months (p=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: