Key result
A higher Life's Essential 8 score of 100 points was associated with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.28) among US adult cancer survivors.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding the dose-response association between cardiovascular health and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality in cancer survivors.
Does higher cardiovascular health (measured by the LE8 score) reduce all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in adult cancer survivors?
Cohort (n=1,701)
Does higher cardiovascular health (measured by the LE8 score) reduce all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in adult cancer survivors?
Hazard Ratio: 0.28 (95% CI 0.12–0.62)
Higher cardiovascular health, as measured by the Life's Essential 8 score, is associated with significantly reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.
Supports CVH assessment in cancer survivors; hypothesis-generating for whether improving CVH reduces mortality.
BACKGROUND: There is little knowledge on the dose-response association between cardiovascular health (CVH) and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer deaths among cancer survivors. AIMS: We aimed to examine the dose-response association of CVH with all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. METHODS: A total of 1701 US adult cancer survivors were followed-up during a median of 7.3 (IQR 4.0-10.2) years from 2007 to 2018 through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We used the American Heart Association´s (AHA) Life´s Essential 8 (LE8) as a proxy for CVH. RESULTS: Restricted cubic spline models indicated a close to inverse linear shape for the dose-response association between LE8 score and all-cause mortality with significant risk reductions within the range between 61.25 (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59-0.98) and 100 points (HR: 0.28, 95%CI, 0.12-0.62), and a curvilinear shape for the dose-response association between LE8 score and CVD deaths with significant risk reductions within the range between 50.25 (HR: 0.72, 95% CI, 0.52-0.99) and 90.25 points (HR: 0.15, 95%CI, 0.02-0.98). No significant dose-response association was observed between LE8 and cancer deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a close to inverse relationship between higher LE8 and risk of death from all cause, an inverse curvilinear relationship between higher LE8 and the risk for CVD death, and a non-significant association between higher LE8 and the risk of cancer death among US adult cancer survivors, which may translate to a substantial number of annual averted deaths and thus important public health implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López‐Bueno et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cancer survivors (n=1,701). Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score vs. Lower LE8 score was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.62). A higher Life's Essential 8 score of 100 points was associated with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.28) among US adult cancer survivors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: