Key result
A wrist photoplethysmographic device provided estimates closely similar to sports laboratory references during submaximal outdoor running (MAPE 5.2%), with energy expenditure MAPE of 6.7% above the aerobic threshold.
Why the study?
Does a wrist-worn optical heart rate device accurately estimate heart rate, energy expenditure, and VO2Max compared to reference methods in healthy adults during running?
Observational (n=23)
Does a wrist-worn optical heart rate device accurately estimate heart rate, energy expenditure, and VO2Max compared to reference methods in healthy adults during running?
A wrist-worn optical heart rate device combined with physiological modeling can accurately estimate heart rate, energy expenditure, and VO2Max during running.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports wearable accuracy in outdoor running; leaves open clinical adoption pending higher-level validation.
BACKGROUND: Wearable sensors enable long-term monitoring of health and wellbeing indicators. An objective evaluation of sensors' accuracy is important, especially for their use in health care. OBJECTIVE: ) against golden reference methods. METHODS: during the submaximal outdoor running test. ECG-based HR and respiratory gas analysis based estimates were used as golden references. RESULTS: estimated during the submaximal outdoor running test was closely similar to the sports laboratory estimate (MAPE 5.2%). The energy expenditure estimate (n=23) was quite accurate when HR was above the aerobic threshold (MAPE 6.7%), but MAPE increased to 16.5% during a lighter intensity of exercise. CONCLUSIONS: even during submaximal self-paced outdoor recreational running.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parák et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Recreational running (n=23). Wrist photoplethysmographic device vs. ECG-based HR and respiratory gas analysis was evaluated on Accuracy of device estimates compared to golden reference methods (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) (MAPE 5.2%). A wrist photoplethysmographic device provided estimates closely similar to sports laboratory references during submaximal outdoor running (MAPE 5.2%), with energy expenditure MAPE of 6.7% above the aerobic threshold.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: