Key result
Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve therapy for bioprosthetic valve failure demonstrated high procedural success, low 30-day mortality, and excellent 1-year survival free of repeat intervention.
Why the study?
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve therapy improve outcomes in patients with bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure?
Observational
Yes
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve therapy improve outcomes in patients with bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure?
Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve therapy demonstrates safety and feasibility, positioning it as a likely first-line treatment for bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure.
Tricuspid VIV may offer a lower-risk option for high-risk patients; registry data leave open the need for RCTs on durability and outcomes.
Redo surgery for bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (VIV) therapy utilizing ballon-expandable transcatheter valves has become available. The tricuspid Valve-in-Valve International Data (VIVID) registry initial results represent the largest experience with tricuspid VIV therapy, demonstrating high procedural success rates with low 30 days mortality and excellent survival free of repeat tricuspid intervention in 1 year. Although longer clinic and hemodynamic follow-up will be needed to fully understand the role of this therapy, these data support the safety, feasibility and beneficial effects of tricuspid VIV therapy. For patients with bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure, tricuspid VIV is likely to become a first-line treatment option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panaich et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Bioprosthetic tricuspid valve failure. Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (VIV) therapy was evaluated on Procedural success, 30-day mortality, and 1-year survival free of repeat tricuspid intervention. Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve therapy for bioprosthetic valve failure demonstrated high procedural success, low 30-day mortality, and excellent 1-year survival free of repeat intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: