Key result
Transfemoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for tricuspid bioprosthesis failure was successful in all 5 patients, leading to improved functional status at 30 days.
Why the study?
Does transfemoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation improve functional status and organ function in patients with tricuspid bioprosthesis failure?
Observational (n=5)
No
Does transfemoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation improve functional status and organ function in patients with tricuspid bioprosthesis failure?
Transfemoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation appears to be a safe and feasible option for treating tricuspid bioprosthesis failure, improving functional status and end-organ congestion at 30 days.
May support feasibility in select cases; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation.
Objectives To report procedural and 30‐day outcomes following percutaneous transcatheter valve‐in‐valve (VIV) implantation for tricuspid bioprosthesis failure, with a new generation balloon‐expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation prosthesis. Background Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with a reduction in survival and increased morbidity. Many patients previously treated with tricuspid valve replacement require further intervention due to bioprosthesis failure. Surgical redo is the “gold standard” treatment however this is technically challenging and associated with significant risk. Percutaneous VIV intervention that is now well established in the management of aortic and mitral bioprosthesis failure may therefore be an alternative treatment option. Methods The study population consisted of all patients that underwent percutaneous transcatheter tricuspid VIV implantation for tricuspid bioprosthesis failure at the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Results Five patients underwent successful transfemoral transcatheter tricuspid VIV implantation for bioprosthetic failure. One patient suffered acute kidney injury that was successfully medically managed. The remaining patients suffered no complications prior to hospital discharge. During 30‐day follow‐up, all patients reported a significant improvement in their functional status with normal valve function. Additionally, we observed an improvement in renal function (eGFR baseline 62.0 ± 16.5 vs. follow‐up 70.2 ± 23.1 ml/min/m 2 , P = 0.12) and improved hepatic congestion: bilirubin (1.47 ± 0.8 vs. 1.01 ± 0.7 mg/DL, P = 0.12), alanine aminotransferase (31.0 ± 11.1 vs. 23.2 ± 5.1 U/L, P = 0.11) and aspartate aminotransferase (35.8 ± 6.3 vs. 29.8 ± 13.6 U/L, P = 0.12). Conclusions Transfemoral, transcatheter VIV treatment with a new generation balloon expandable devices appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment option for tricuspid bioprosthesis failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruparelia et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Tricuspid bioprosthesis failure (n=5). Percutaneous transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation was evaluated on Procedural and 30-day outcomes. Transfemoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for tricuspid bioprosthesis failure was successful in all 5 patients, leading to improved functional status at 30 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: