Why the study?
Does plasma BNP level at admission predict right ventricular involvement in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction?
Does plasma BNP level at admission predict right ventricular involvement in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction?
Plasma BNP levels >46 pg/ml at admission can serve as a useful biomarker to identify right ventricular involvement in patients presenting with acute inferior myocardial infarction.
BNP >46 pg/ml may identify RVMI in inferior MI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is secreted from the ventricles in response to volume expansion and pressure overload. We aimed to investigate plasma BNP levels in inferior myocardial infarction (MI) with and without right ventricular MI (RVMI). METHODS: We enrolled 49 patients (mean age: 60+/-10 years, 45 males) who were admitted with first acute inferior MI. Sixteen patients (mean age: 58+/-10 years, 15 males) had also RVMI. The BNP levels were measured at admission. All patients underwent echocardiographic examination in the first day of hospitalization. Receiver-operating characteristic curve was obtained for prediction of inferior MI with RVMI. RESULTS: Inferior MI with RVMI had lower RV fractional area change (36+/-14% vs. 48+/-15%, P=0.03) and right ventricle lateral annulus S velocity (10.6+/-1.9 m/s, 12.2+/-2.6 m/s, P=0.02). The BNP levels were higher in inferior MI with RVMI than isolated inferior MI (75+/-44 pg/ml vs. 32+/-24 pg/ml, P=0.001). On the basis of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff value of BNP concentration >46 pg/ml provided the best discrimination of patients with and without RVMI (sensitivity 76%, specificity 88%) with positive and negative predictive values of 92 and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Plasma BNP levels are higher in inferior MI with RVMI than isolated inferior MI. RV involvement may be suspected when BNP levels are higher than 46 pg/ml in inferior MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaya et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: