Why the study?
Early clinical data showed responsiveness to low doses of angiotensin II in some patients with vasodilatory shock, but outcomes stratified by dose requirement needed investigation.
Does a low dose requirement (≤ 5 ng kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) of angiotensin II at 30 minutes predict better clinical outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock?
Does a low dose requirement (≤ 5 ng kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) of angiotensin II at 30 minutes predict better clinical outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock?
In patients with vasodilatory shock, the ability to down-titrate angiotensin II to ≤ 5 ng kg⁻¹ min⁻¹ at 30 minutes is an early predictor of improved survival and favorable clinical outcomes.
Low-dose responders showed better safety in this analysis; hypothesis-generating for dose-stratified angiotensin II use and requires prospective validation.
Early clinical data showed that some patients with vasodilatory shock are responsive to low doses of angiotensin II. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in patients requiring ≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 angiotensin II at 30 min (≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup) to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 75 mmHg versus patients receiving > 5 ng kg −1 min −1 angiotensin II at 30 min (> 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup). Data from angiotensin II-treated patients enrolled in the ATHOS-3 trial were used. The subgroup of patients whose angiotensin II dose was down-titrated from 20 ng kg −1 min −1 at treatment initiation to ≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 at 30 min (79/163) had significantly lower endogenous serum angiotensin II levels and norepinephrine-equivalent doses and significantly higher MAP versus the > 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup (84/163). Patients in the ≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup were more likely to have a MAP response at 3 h versus those in the > 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup (90% vs. 51%, respectively; odds ratio, 8.46 [95% CI 3.63–19.7], P < 0.001). Day 28 survival was also higher in the ≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup versus the > 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup (59% vs. 33%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI 0.28–0.72], P = 0.0007); multivariate analyses supported the survival benefit in patients with lower angiotensin II levels. The ≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup had a more favorable safety profile and lower treatment discontinuation rate than the > 5 ng kg −1 min −1 subgroup. This prespecified analysis showed that down-titration to ≤ 5 ng kg −1 min −1 angiotensin II at 30 min is an early predictor of favorable clinical outcomes which may be related to relative angiotensin II insufficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ham et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: