In healthy subjects, monocytes circulate in constant, reversible, and predominantly calcium-dependent aggregation with platelets.
EDTA use may artifactually reduce detected monocyte-platelet aggregates; leaves open in vivo calcium dependence and disease relevance.
We aimed to provide evidence that blood monocytes belonging to all subsets predominantly circulate in constant and usually reversible interactions with platelets, which are predominantly [Ca2+] dependent. The proportions of monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs) attributable to individual monocyte subsets in fresh and promptly processed heparin-anticoagulated blood from 10 healthy subjects (median age 35 years, 50% male) were analysed by flow cytometry and compared to samples anticoagulated with a potent [Ca2+] chelator, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Additional experiments with [Ca2+] depletion or supplementation were also performed. Monocytes subsets were defined as CD14++CD16-CCR2+ cells (Mon1), CD14++CD16+CCR2+ cells (Mon2) and CD14+CD16++CCR2- cells (Mon3). Vast majority of monocytes showed aggregation with platelets in heparinised samples, but most monocytes were free of platelets when EDTA was used (p<0.001 for all subsets). Addition of the heparinised blood to EDTA-containing vacutainers reduced the proportion of MPAs to values seen in the directly EDTA-anticoagulated blood (p=0.005 for all subsets). Supplementation with CaCl2 resulted in dose-dependent increase in MPAs (p<0.001 for all subsets). Although the overall trend for the monocyte-platelet interactions was applicable to all monocyte subsets, the proportion of MPAs in heparinised samples was lowest for Mon3 (p<0.0001). In contrast, Mon3 showed the highest proportion of MPAs in EDTA-anticoagulated samples (p=0.004). In healthy subjects monocytes circulate in constant, but predominantly reversible and [Ca2+]-dependent aggregation with platelets. These observations may reflect a complex involvement of platelets in regulation of monocyte activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shantsila et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: