Key result
The tube exercise test post S-ICD implantation predicted inappropriate shocks due to myopotential interference with 100% sensitivity, 78% specificity, and 100% negative predictive value.
Why the study?
Inappropriate shocks due to extracardiac myopotentials are common with S-ICDs, but no screening tests currently exist to identify patients at risk for myopotential interference.
Does a tube exercise test (TET) post S-ICD implantation accurately identify patients at risk for inappropriate shocks due to myopotential interference?
Observational (n=43)
Does a tube exercise test (TET) post S-ICD implantation accurately identify patients at risk for inappropriate shocks due to myopotential interference?
A novel tube exercise test performed post S-ICD implantation can effectively identify patients at risk for inappropriate shocks due to myopotential interference, with a 100% negative predictive value.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May identify S-ICD patients at risk for myopotential IAS; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is effective in preventing sudden cardiac death. Compared with transvenous ICDs, S-ICDs have a lower rate of inappropriate shocks (IASs) for supraventricular arrhythmias, but such shocks for T-wave oversensing (TWO) and extracardiac myopotentials are more common. No screening tests to identify patients at risk for IAS due to myopotential interference (MPI) currently are available. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a tube exercise test (TET) developed to detect MPI post S-ICD implantation. METHODS: TET includes 3 different maneuvers using an exercise tube. S-ICD electrograms were recorded to assess MPI while patients performed each of the maneuvers. RESULTS: TET was performed in 43 patients, and MPI was observed in 12 patients (28%). In 10 of the 12 TET-positive patients, the positive vector corresponded with a vector that did not show TWO on standard S-ICD preoperative screening. During median follow-up of 672 days (interquartile range 465-805 days), 3 patients (7%) experienced IAS due to MPI. Importantly, the vector at the time of IAS in all 3 patients passed standard preoperative screening for TWO but was positive with TET. Sensitivity and specificity of TET were 100% and 78%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 25% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Postimplant screening for MPI identified patients at increased risk for IAS. TET may be helpful for guiding optimal programming to prevent IAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishida et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) (n=43). Tube exercise test (TET) vs. Standard S-ICD preoperative screening was evaluated on Inappropriate shocks due to myopotential interference. The tube exercise test post S-ICD implantation predicted inappropriate shocks due to myopotential interference with 100% sensitivity, 78% specificity, and 100% negative predictive value.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: