Key result
The proposed remote method for continuous blood pressure estimation using spatial pulse-wave dynamics from facial video achieved a mean absolute error of 5.4 mmHg and a correlation coefficient of 0.85 for mean blood pressure.
Why the study?
Does a CNN-based model using spatial pulse-wave dynamics from facial video improve the accuracy of remote continuous blood pressure estimation compared to conventional pulse features in healthy volunteers?
Does a CNN-based model using spatial pulse-wave dynamics from facial video improve the accuracy of remote continuous blood pressure estimation compared to conventional pulse features in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 8.3%
A novel deep learning-based method using spatial pulse-wave dynamics from facial video provides accurate remote continuous blood pressure estimation in a proof-of-concept study.
We propose a remote method to estimate continuous blood pressure (BP) based on spatial information of a pulse-wave as a function of time. By setting regions of interest to cover a face in a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive manner, RGB facial video is converted into a spatial pulse-wave signal. The spatial pulse-wave signal is converted into spatial signals of contours of each segmented pulse beat and relationships of each segmented pulse beat. The spatial signal is represented as a time-continuous value based on a representation of a pulse contour in a time axis and a phase axis and an interpolation along with the time axis. A relationship between the spatial signals and BP is modeled by a convolutional neural network. A dataset was built to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The dataset consists of continuous BP and facial RGB videos of ten healthy volunteers. The results show an adequate estimation of the performance of the proposed method when compared to the ground truth in mean BP, in both the correlation coefficient (0.85) and mean absolute error (5.4 mmHg). For comparison, the dataset was processed using conventional pulse features, and the estimation error produced by our method was significantly lower. To visualize the root source of the BP signals used by our method, we have visualized spatial-wise and channel-wise contributions to the estimation by the deep learning model. The result suggests the spatial-wise contribution pattern depends on the blood pressure, while the pattern of pulse contour-wise contribution pattern reflects the relationship between percussion wave and dicrotic wave.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iuchi et al. (2022) studied Healthy (n=10). Spatial pulse-wave dynamics from facial video (CNN-based method) vs. Conventional pulse features (multilayer perceptron) and Finometer MIDI ground truth was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) for mean blood pressure (MBP). The proposed remote method for continuous blood pressure estimation using spatial pulse-wave dynamics from facial video achieved a mean absolute error of 5.4 mmHg and a correlation coefficient of 0.85 for mean blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: