Key result
Apparent resistant hypertension in women was associated with a 1.4-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-resistant hypertension (HR 1.40) over a median follow-up of 14.3 years.
Why the study?
Does apparent resistant hypertension increase the risk of all-cause mortality in adult women across the spectrum of coronary disease?
Observational (n=15,108)
Yes
Does apparent resistant hypertension increase the risk of all-cause mortality in adult women across the spectrum of coronary disease?
Hazard Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 1.27–1.55)
Absolute Event Rate: 40.9% vs 22.2%
Apparent resistant hypertension in women is associated with a substantial and sustained increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-resistant hypertension or no hypertension.
Supports monitoring for mortality risk in women with apparent resistant hypertension; leaves open whether intensified therapy improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Women are at greater risk of developing resistant hypertension (RH) than men, yet scarce data exist on RH-associated outcomes in women. We aimed to determine all-cause mortality risk associated with apparent RH (aRH) among women across the spectrum of underlying coronary disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from St. James Women Take Heart (WTH; women without coronary disease at baseline), Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (women with signs/symptoms of ischemia at baseline), and the INternational VErapamil-Trandolapril STudy (INVEST; women with coronary artery disease and hypertension at baseline), totaling 15,108 adult women with no hypertension, non-RH (blood pressure [BP] ≥140/90 mmHg on ≤2 drugs or BP <140/90 mmHg on 1-3 drugs), or aRH (BP ≥140/90 mmHg on ≥3 drugs or anyone on ≥4 drugs) at baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Prevalence of aRH ranged from 0.4% (WTH) to 10.6% (INVEST). Women with aRH, compared to those without, were older, more often black, and more likely to be obese or diabetic. Pooling all cohorts, risk for all-cause death was greater in women with aRH than in women with non-RH (adjusted HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.27-1.55) and women without hypertension (adjusted HR 2.34; 95% CI 1.76-3.11) over a median follow-up of 14.3 years. CONCLUSIONS: aRH prevalence in women varies according to underlying coronary disease, and aRH is associated with a substantial, early, and sustained increased risk of all-cause death. Additional research into early recognition and prevention strategies for RH are needed, especially in black and older women, and those with known cardiovascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Hypertension and varying levels of underlying coronary disease (n=15,108). Apparent resistant hypertension (aRH) vs. Non-resistant hypertension (non-RH) and no hypertension was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27-1.55). Apparent resistant hypertension in women was associated with a 1.4-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-resistant hypertension (HR 1.40) over a median follow-up of 14.3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: