Key result
Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is linked to ~3.2-fold higher major cardiovascular events risk in women vs normotension.
Why the study?
Does apparent treatment-resistant hypertension increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with suspected myocardial ischemia?
Cohort (n=927)
Yes
Does apparent treatment-resistant hypertension increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with suspected myocardial ischemia?
In women with suspected myocardial ischemia, apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is associated with a profoundly increased long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant closer surveillance in women with suspected ischemia; leaves open whether intensified BP control improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Women are more likely than men to develop resistant hypertension, which is associated with excess risk of major adverse outcomes; however, the impact of resistant hypertension in women with ischemia has not been explicitly studied. In this Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) analysis, we assessed long-term adverse outcomes associated with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) among women with suspected myocardial ischemia referred for coronary angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Women (n=927) were grouped according to baseline blood pressure (BP): normotensive (no hypertension history, BP <140/90 mm Hg, no antihypertensive drugs); controlled (BP <140/90 mm Hg and a hypertension diagnosis or on 1 to 3 drugs); uncontrolled (BP ≥140/90 mm Hg on ≤2 drugs); or aTRH (BP ≥140/90 mm Hg on 3 drugs or anyone on ≥4 drugs). Adverse outcomes (first occurrence of death [any cause], nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure or angina) were collected over 10 years of follow-up. Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension prevalence was 10.4% among those with hypertension. Women with aTRH had a greater incidence of adverse outcomes, compared with normotensive women (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94 to 5.43), and women with controlled (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.49) and uncontrolled (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.27) hypertension; outcome differences were evident early in follow-up. Risk of all-cause death was greater in the aTRH group, compared to the normotensive women and women with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of women with evidence of ischemia, aTRH was associated with a profoundly increased long-term risk of major adverse events, including death, that emerged early during follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Suspected myocardial ischemia (n=927). Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) vs. Normotensive women was evaluated on First occurrence of death from any cause, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure or angina (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.94 to 5.43, p=<0.0001). Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension profoundly increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to normotensive women.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: