Key result
The CardioMEMS HF System significantly reduced the rate of heart failure hospitalizations in the year after implantation compared with the year before (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.38-0.66; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Although the benefit of haemodynamic-guided management with the CardioMEMS HF System has been demonstrated previously, no data from French patients had been published.
Does haemodynamic-guided management with the CardioMEMS HF System reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with NYHA class III heart failure?
Cohort (n=103)
Open-label
Does haemodynamic-guided management with the CardioMEMS HF System reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with NYHA class III heart failure?
Haemodynamic-guided management with the CardioMEMS HF System is safe and significantly reduces heart failure hospitalizations in French patients with NYHA class III heart failure.
Supports CardioMEMS safety in HF; leaves open randomized confirmation of HFH reduction before practice change.
• Rehospitalization is a frequent and serious complication in patients with HF. • The CardioMEMS™ HF System is an invasive remote monitoring device. • The CardioMEMS™ HF System is known to reduce HFHs significantly. • COAST: open-label safety and effectiveness study with CardioMEMS™ HF System. • 103 patients were included in the French cohort of COAST. • No device/system complications or pressure sensor failures 2 years after implant. • 50.3% reduction in risk of HFH in the year after implant versus the year before. Previous studies have demonstrated the benefit of a haemodynamic-guided management strategy with the CardioMEMS™ HF System. No data from French patients have been published. To analyse the feasibility, safety and clinical benefit of the CardioMEMS™ HF System in 103 French patients included in the CardioMEMS HF System Post-Market Study (COAST). Prospective open-label cohort of New York Heart Association class III patients with at least one heart failure hospitalization in the 12 months before enrolment, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction. The primary safety endpoints assessed the freedom from device/system-related complications and from pressure sensor failure at 2 years after implantation. The primary efficacy endpoint was evaluated comparing the rate of heart failure hospitalization during the year before and the year after implantation. At 2 years, there were no device/system-related complications or pressure sensor failures ( P < 0.0001). There were 179 heart failure hospitalizations in the year before implantation compared with 79 in the year after implantation (risk reduction 50.3%; rate ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.66; P < 0.0001). During the 2 years of follow-up, pulmonary artery pressures were lowered significantly (mean pulmonary artery pressure –3.7 ± 6.3 mmHg; P < 0.0001), with a significant improvement in functional class and quality of life. In the French cohort of the COAST study, we have demonstrated that the CardioMEMS™ HF System is a reliable device, with no device/system-related complications or pressure sensor failures. Patients in this open-label cohort had a significant reduction in pulmonary artery pressures, with an improvement in New York Heart Association classification and quality of life, and a 50% reduction in the heart failure hospitalization rate in the year following implantation compared with the previous year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groote et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=103). CardioMEMS HF System vs. Year before implantation was evaluated on Rate of heart failure hospitalization during the year before and the year after implantation (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.66, p=<0.0001). The CardioMEMS HF System significantly reduced the rate of heart failure hospitalizations in the year after implantation compared with the year before (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.38-0.66; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: