Key result
In a national cohort of 72,088 patients in Lithuania, 57.4% were non-persistent to newly initiated antihypertensive therapy after one year.
Why the study?
Poor persistence to antihypertensive therapy causes treatment failure, and investigating persistence is especially important in countries with high cardiovascular mortality such as Lithuania.
Cohort (n=72,088)
Over half of patients newly initiated on antihypertensive therapy in Lithuania become non-persistent within the first year, highlighting a major gap in cardiovascular risk management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High non-persistence rates in Lithuania warrant adherence interventions; leaves open which modifiable factors most improve real-world persistence.
PURPOSE: Poor persistence to antihypertensive therapy is an important cause of treatment failure. Investigating persistence is especially important in countries with a high cardiovascular mortality, like Lithuania. The aim of this study was to describe the antihypertensive treatment at initiation, to determine the percentage of patients not being persistent with antihypertensive treatment after 1 year and to explore factors associated with non-persistence. METHODS: In this cohort study, data on dispensed prescription medicines from the Lithuanian National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) were used. All adult patients with a diagnosis of hypertension having first antihypertensive dispensed in 2018 were included. Descriptive statistics was used to determine the number of patients started with monotherapy and combination therapy. Treatment choice by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) and number of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) was described. Non-persistence was assessed using the anniversary method. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with non-persistence. RESULTS: A total of 72,088 patients were included into the study, 56% started on monotherapy treatment, with 49% being dispensed an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and 44% started on combination therapy. Overall, 57% of patients were non-persistent after 1 year. Patients' gender and prescriber qualification showed no association with non-persistence. Younger patients, patients from rural area, patients started with monotherapy, and patients with no medication change had higher odds to become non-persistent. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients were initiated with treatment following hypertension management guidelines, but it is of concern that over half of the patients were non-persistent to antihypertensive therapy in the first year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trečiokienė et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=72,088). Antihypertensive therapy was evaluated on Non-persistence to antihypertensive therapy at 1 year. In a national cohort of 72,088 patients in Lithuania, 57.4% were non-persistent to newly initiated antihypertensive therapy after one year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: