Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This letter reconsiders the empirical tests of the new Keynesian and new classical models performed by Ball Mankiw and Romer and Akerlof, Rose and Yellen. The original tests conform basically to cross-section analysis; we develop both time-series and pooled cross-section, time-series tests of these issues, using the methodology and results of Katsimbris. Our tests find at best weak support for either the new Keynesian or the new classical hypotheses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsimbris et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: