Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan was superior to RAS inhibitors in general renal safety, resulting in fewer worsening renal function events, elevated creatine levels, and severe hyperkalemia.
Why the study?
Sacubitril/valsartan plays a significant role as first-line therapy in heart failure, but its effect on renal function remains uncertain.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve renal safety compared to RASi in patients with heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or chronic kidney disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=19,367)
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve renal safety compared to RASi in patients with heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or chronic kidney disease?
Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrates superior general renal safety compared to RASi, with advantages potentially becoming more obvious with prolonged treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
S/V improves renal safety vs RASi in HF; confirms advantage across 13 RCTs and supports first-line preference.
As a first-line therapy, sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) plays a significant role in the treatment of heart failure. However, its effect on renal function is still uncertain. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials for randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of S/V on renal function in patients. The results are reported as the mean difference, relative ratio, and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included (19,367 patients). Among them, 11 studies focused on patients with heart failure, 1 on patients with acute myocardial infarction, and 1 on patients with chronic kidney disease. We found that fewer worsening renal function events, elevated creatine level events, and severe hyperkalemia events (blood potassium >6.0 mmol/L) occurred in the S/V group than those in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RASi) group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased in both the S/V group and the RASi group, but the change was more obvious in the RASi group. There was no significant difference in hyperkalemia events (blood potassium >5.5 mmol/L) between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis showed that with the extension of follow-up time (>6 months), worsening renal function events occurred less frequently in the S/V group than in the RASi group. Existing evidence has shown that S/V is superior to RASi in general renal safety. Perhaps with the prolongation of treatment time, the advantages of S/V are more obvious.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease (n=19,367). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RASi) was evaluated on Renal safety (worsening renal function, elevated creatine, severe hyperkalemia, eGFR). Sacubitril/valsartan was superior to RAS inhibitors in general renal safety, resulting in fewer worsening renal function events, elevated creatine levels, and severe hyperkalemia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: