Key result
Pulmonary artery pressure-guided management reduces heart failure admissions ~33% versus usual care.
Why the study?
Following initial 6-month reductions in heart failure hospital admissions with pulmonary artery pressure-guided management in the CHAMPION trial, extended efficacy over 18 months and subsequent open-access pressure information remained to be examined.
Does pulmonary artery pressure-guided management reduce hospital admissions in patients with NYHA Class III heart failure and a previous admission?
RCT (n=550)
Single-blind
1:1 by centre in block sizes of four
Yes
Does pulmonary artery pressure-guided management reduce hospital admissions in patients with NYHA Class III heart failure and a previous admission?
Hazard Ratio: 0.67 (95% CI 0.55–0.8)
p-value: p=<0.0001
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Management of NYHA Class III heart failure based on home transmission of pulmonary artery pressure with an implanted pressure sensor has significant long-term benefit in lowering hospital admission rates for heart failure.
Abraham et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=550). Pulmonary artery pressure-guided management vs. Usual care was evaluated on Rate of hospital admissions for heart failure (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p=<0.0001). Pulmonary artery pressure-guided management significantly reduced the rate of hospital admissions for heart failure compared with usual care (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.80; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: