Key result
Lower circulating adiponectin levels were independently associated with metabolic inflammatory syndrome in elderly inpatients (OR 22.937, p < 0.001).
Why the study?
It was unclear whether adiponectin is associated with metabolic inflammatory syndrome, prompting this evaluation of circulating adiponectin as an indicator for MIS in elderly adults.
Cross-Sectional (n=136)
Odds Ratio: 22.937
p-value: p=<0.001
Lower circulating adiponectin levels are independently associated with metabolic inflammatory syndrome in elderly patients and may serve as a biomarker for atherosclerosis in this population.
MIS may refine CHD risk stratification beyond MetS; hypothesis-generating in cross-sectional data, needs prospective confirmation.
Background: Metabolic inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and obesity. The above metabolic disorders often coexist and are closely related with systemic low-grade inflammation. Metabolic inflammatory syndrome (MIS), a cluster of these four metabolic disorders, is a novel concept that is thought to be a better predictor of coronary heart disease than metabolic syndrome. Adiponectin is an adipokine that increases insulin sensitivity and antioxidation as well as has an anti-atherosclerosis effect. It is unclear whether adiponectin is associated with MIS. The objective of this study was to assess whether circulating adiponectin can be used as an indicator for MIS in elderly adults. Methods: A total of 136 elderly inpatients were divided into two groups: the MIS group and the non-MIS group. Characteristics, inflammatory markers, blood lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, and circulating adiponectin levels were assessed and compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between the associated factors and MIS. Results: MIS patients were more likely to have a higher body mass index, have a higher fasting blood glucose level, be smokers, have fundus arteriosclerosis, have lower levels of adiponectin (4044.90 ± 3906.82 ng/mL vs 8503.89 ± 3523.89 ng/mL, p < 0.001), and have higher levels of inflammation (white blood cell and C-reactive protein) than non-MIS patients. Multiple factor analysis showed that lower adiponectin levels (OR = 22.937, p < 0.001) were independently associated with MIS. Adiponectin levels were lower in the vascular disease (2673.29 ± 1930.05 ng/mL vs 7194.38 ± 4615.83 ng/mL, p = 0.001), atherosclerosis (2374.14 [1496.41– 4263.90] ng/mL vs 6037.48 [3865.61– 10,373.60] ng/mL, p < 0.001), and type 2 diabetes (2391.73 [1386.41– 4069.68] ng/mL vs 8916.03 [5801.14– 12,724.45] ng/mL, p < 0.001) subgroups than in the non-MIS group. Conclusion: Lower adiponectin levels in serum are associated with MIS. Low adiponectin may be used as a biomarker for atherosclerosis in patients with MIS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic inflammatory syndrome (n=136). Lower circulating adiponectin levels vs. Higher circulating adiponectin levels (non-MIS group) was evaluated on Metabolic inflammatory syndrome (MIS) (OR 22.937, p=<0.001). Lower circulating adiponectin levels were independently associated with metabolic inflammatory syndrome in elderly inpatients (OR 22.937, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: