Key result
Five-year relative survival following unprotected left main stem PCI was 93.8% for chronic stable angina, 73.1% for NSTEACS, 77.5% for STEMI without cardiogenic shock, and 28.5% for STEMI with cardiogenic shock.
Why the study?
Does unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention improve 5-year survival in patients with coronary artery disease compared to the general population?
Cohort (n=10,682)
Yes
Does unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention improve 5-year survival in patients with coronary artery disease compared to the general population?
Long-term survival following UPLMS PCI for chronic stable angina is high and approaches that of the background population, whereas survival in acute presentations is lower and strongly predicted by preprocedural ventilation or TIMI flow.
Relative survival after UPLMS PCI is high in CSA but poor in shock; leaves open targeted strategies to mitigate excess mortality by presentation.
OBJECTIVE: For percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the unprotected left main stem (UPLMS), there are limited long-term outcome data. We evaluated 5-year survival for UPLMS PCI cases taking into account background population mortality. METHODS: A population-based registry of 10 682 cases of chronic stable angina (CSA), non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with (STEMI+CS) and without cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) who received UPLMS PCI from 2005 to 2014 were matched by age, sex, year of procedure and country to death data for the UK populace of 56.6 million people. Relative survival and excess mortality were estimated. RESULTS: Over 26 105 person-years follow-up, crude 5-year relative survival was 93.8% for CSA, 73.1% for NSTEACS, 77.5% for STEMI-CS and 28.5% for STEMI+CS. The strongest predictor of excess mortality among CSA was renal failure (EMRR 6.73, 95% CI 4.06 to 11.15), and for NSTEACS and STEMI-CS was preprocedural ventilation (6.25, 5.05 to 7.75 and 6.92, 4.25 to 11.26, respectively). For STEMI+CS, the strongest predictor of excess mortality was preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 0 flow (2.78, 1.87 to 4.13), whereas multivessel PCI was associated with improved survival (0.74, 0.61 to 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival following UPLMS PCI for CSA was high, approached that of the background populace and was significantly predicted by co-morbidity. For NSTEACS and STEMI-CS, the requirement for preprocedural ventilation was the strongest determinant of excess mortality. By contrast, among STEMI+CS, in whom survival was poor, the strongest determinant was preprocedural TIMI flow. Future cardiovascular cohort studies of long-term mortality should consider the impact of non-cardiovascular deaths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alabas et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Unprotected left main stem coronary disease (n=10,682). Unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention vs. Matched United Kingdom general populace was evaluated on Five-year relative survival. Five-year relative survival following unprotected left main stem PCI was 93.8% for chronic stable angina, 73.1% for NSTEACS, 77.5% for STEMI without cardiogenic shock, and 28.5% for STEMI with cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: