Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with 178 adverse events showing significant disproportionality in 20,021 reports, including an unexpected signal for early sudden cardiac death.
Why the study?
The study aimed to characterise the clinical priority of adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan to target preventive measures.
What are the clinical priorities of adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan in the real world compared to other cardiovascular drugs?
Observational (n=20,021)
Yes
What are the clinical priorities of adverse events associated with sacubitril/valsartan in the real world compared to other cardiovascular drugs?
Real-world pharmacovigilance data for sacubitril/valsartan confirms expected adverse events like renal failure and hyperkalemia, but also identifies an unexpected early signal for sudden cardiac death, highlighting the need for careful monitoring of co-medications with pro-arrhythmic potential.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Signals for select adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan merit vigilance; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice impact.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to characterise clinical priority of adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan for targeting preventive measures. METHODS: We used the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (worldwide pharmacovigilance database) to compare adverse events recording sacubitril/valsartan as suspect with other cardiovascular drugs. Disproportionality analyses were performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios, deemed significant when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was greater than 1. Clinical priority was assigned to adverse events with significant disproportionality by scoring (range 0-10 points) five features (number of events, magnitude of the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval, mortality frequency, important/designated medical event, biological plausibility). RESULTS: Sacubitril/valsartan was recorded in 20,021 reports, with 178 adverse events associated with significant disproportionality: 71.9%, 25.9% and 2.2% were classified as weak, moderate and strong clinical priorities, respectively. Increased reporting emerged for several cardiovascular adverse events, including 'renal failure' (N = 388; lower limit of the 95% confidence interval 2.26), 'hyperkalaemia' (314; 2.42) and 'angioedema' (309; 1.56). Sudden cardiac death (priority score 9 points) was the only designated medical event with strong clinical priority. Notably, sudden cardiac death occurred early after sacubitril/valsartan administration (average onset 124 days), with concomitant drugs known for pro-arrhythmic potential (e.g. amiodarone, escitalopram, mirtazapine, loop diuretics) in 26.2% of records. CONCLUSION: The increased cardiovascular reporting of sacubitril/valsartan in the real world was largely predictable from pre-approval evidence, underlying disease and likely patients' comorbidities. The unexpected reporting of sudden cardiac death occurred well before the complete development of positive electrical remodelling induced by sacubitril/valsartan, and calls for stringent clinical monitoring (to reduce the pro-arrhythmic burden related to co-medications), and further investigation on appropriate combination with other preventive measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gatti et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan (n=20,021). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Other cardiovascular drugs was evaluated on Adverse events with significant disproportionality (reporting odds ratios). Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with 178 adverse events showing significant disproportionality in 20,021 reports, including an unexpected signal for early sudden cardiac death.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: