Key result
Immunization with the soluble recombinant NPt-VP1t protein elicited significantly stronger humoral and cellular immune responses, including a 1.6-fold higher splenocyte stimulation index compared to the insoluble formulation.
Why the study?
Enterovirus 71 causes hand, foot, and mouth disease with neurological complications, creating an urgent need for effective vaccines targeting the antigenic VP1 protein.
Does soluble recombinant NPt-VP1t elicit stronger immune responses compared to the insoluble form in mice?
Does soluble recombinant NPt-VP1t elicit stronger immune responses compared to the insoluble form in mice?
Effect estimate: 1.6 times greater
Absolute Event Rate: 0.826% vs 0.53%
p-value: p=<0.05
The soluble recombinant NPt-VP1t protein elicited robust humoral and cellular immune responses in mice, outperforming the insoluble form and supporting its potential as a subunit vaccine candidate for EV71.
Caution against clinical adoption; leaves open human immunogenicity and efficacy of NPt-VP1t.
INTRODUCTION: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major causative agent of hand, foot, and mouth disease with potential neurological complications, highlighting the urgent need for effective vaccines. The viral protein 1 (VP1) contains major antigenic and neutralizing epitopes, making it a promising target for subunit vaccine development. AIMS: This study evaluated the immunogenicity of a recombinant VP1 fragment (amino acids 198-297) fused to a truncated Newcastle Disease Virus nucleoprotein (NPt-VP1t). MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Soluble NPt-VP1t (SP) and insoluble NPt-VP1t (IB) versions of the protein were expressed in E. coli, purified, and verified by SDS-PAGE and Western blot using anti-VP1 and anti-NDV antibodies, confirming the ~59 kDa fusion protein. Adult female BALB/c mice were immunized intraperitoneally with SP, IB, or PBS control, with two booster doses at two-week intervals. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that mice immunized with the SP formulation produced significantly higher anti-VP1 IgG reactivity than those receiving the IB or controls (p < 0.05). After the first booster (week 4), the antibody level in the SP was approximately 2-fold higher than the IB, with the highest OD readings observed at week 8 post-immunization. The SP maintained high antibody levels for at least two weeks post-booster. Splenocyte proliferation assays revealed that the SB group had a stimulation index (S.I.) of 0.826 ± 0.104, about 1.6 times greater than the IB group (p < 0.05). Cytokine profiling showed significantly elevated Th1 (IFN-γ, IL-2) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10) cytokines in both SP and IB groups compared to controls (p < 0.05), with IFN-γ levels markedly higher in vaccinated mice, indicating activation of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. SDS-PAGE of the IB protein revealed contaminant bands, suggesting the actual amount of NPt-VP1t administered was lower than in the soluble formulation, potentially affecting its immunogenicity. All groups received formulations with Freund’s adjuvant, which may limit assessment of vaccine-specific safety. CONCLUSION: Overall, the SP recombinant NPt-VP1t protein elicited robust humoral and cellular immune responses in mice, outperforming the insoluble form. These findings support the immunogenic potential of SP as a subunit vaccine candidate for EV71. Future studies should include viral challenge and neutralization assays to confirm protective efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mustafa et al. (2025) studied Healthy (Vaccine model for Enterovirus 71) (n=22). Soluble recombinant NPt-VP1t protein vs. Insoluble NPt-VP1t protein and PBS control was evaluated on Splenocyte proliferation (Stimulation Index) upon VP1 stimulation (1.6 times greater, p=<0.05). Immunization with the soluble recombinant NPt-VP1t protein elicited significantly stronger humoral and cellular immune responses, including a 1.6-fold higher splenocyte stimulation index compared to the insoluble formulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: