Key result
Cuffless blood pressure measurements significantly correlated with standard cuff-based measurements (P<.001), although cuffless values were higher with differences in SBP reaching up to 20 mmHg.
Why the study?
It remains unknown how blood pressure values obtained with a new cuffless device compare with standard ambulatory measurements in children.
Are blood pressure values measured by a cuffless PTT device comparable with measurements by a standard upper arm cuff-based BP device in children?
Observational (n=30)
Are blood pressure values measured by a cuffless PTT device comparable with measurements by a standard upper arm cuff-based BP device in children?
p-value: p=<.001
While cuffless BP devices using pulse transit time correlate significantly with standard cuff-based measurements in children, they yield higher values and are not directly interchangeable for 24-hour monitoring.
Cuffless PTT BP values exceeded cuff-based readings in children; leaves open calibration needs before ambulatory adoption.
OBJECTIVE: In recent times, new methods of blood pressure measurements have been introduced, including cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement device using pulse transit time (PTT) for calculation of BP values. However, it is still unknown how values obtained with a new cuffless device compare with standard ambulatory measurements in children. The main aim of the study was to investigate whether BP values measured by a cuffless PTT device are comparable with measurements by a standard upper arm cuff-based BP device. METHODS: Thirty children were prospectively included. Blood pressure measurements using the cuffless device (Somnotouch-NIBP) and cuff-based standard device (Omron 907) were performed simultaneously on the left and right arm. RESULTS: < .001). There were significant positive correlations between standard and cuffless measurements. CONCLUSION: The results show that the created PWV-BP function produces a significant correlation between BP derived from the PWV and the SBP measured by sphygmomanometry. When applying this device in clinical practice, one may keep in mind that the reported mean values over 24 hours, awake and asleep time are not directly interchangeable with cuff-based standard 24-hour BP values. The measured BP values were higher by the new technique. Although differences in SBP between both methods reached values up to 20 mmHg, we think that the development of a cuffless BP monitoring system will provide novel solutions in various medical situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zachwieja et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Blood pressure measurement in children (n=30). Cuffless blood pressure measurement device (Somnotouch-NIBP) vs. Cuff-based standard device (Omron 907) was evaluated on Correlation between standard and cuffless blood pressure measurements (p=<.001). Cuffless blood pressure measurements significantly correlated with standard cuff-based measurements (P<.001), although cuffless values were higher with differences in SBP reaching up to 20 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: