Key result
Levels of Apo-C1, Apo-J, and Apo-M were significantly higher, and Apo-B100 and Apo-L1 significantly lower, in patients who died from cardiovascular causes compared to those alive at 3 years.
Why the study?
Risk stratification in chronic systolic HF is critical to identify candidates for advanced therapies, motivating the search for new biomarkers to improve prognosis evaluation and understand HF pathophysiology.
Do specific apolipoprotein levels predict cardiovascular death in patients with chronic systolic heart failure?
Case-Control (n=198)
Do specific apolipoprotein levels predict cardiovascular death in patients with chronic systolic heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proteomic profiling of apolipoproteins, particularly Apo-C1, Apo-J, and Apo-M, may serve as novel biomarkers to improve risk stratification for cardiovascular death in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
PURPOSE: Risk stratification in chronic systolic heart failure (HF) is critical to identify the patients who may benefit from advanced therapies. It is aimed at identifying new biomarkers to improve prognosis evaluation and help to better understand HF physiopathology. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Prognostic evaluation is performed in 198 patients with chronic systolic HF: 99 patients who died from cardiovascular cause within three years are individually matched for age, sex, and HF etiology (ischemic vs not) with 99 patients who are alive after three years of HF evaluation. A proteomic profiling of 15 apolipoproteins (Apo) is performed: Apo-A1, -A2, -A4, -B100, -C1, -C2, -C3, -C4, -D, -E, -F, -H, -J, -L1, and -M using LC-MRM-MS. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the levels of Apo-B100 and -L1 are significantly lower and the levels of Apo-C1, -J, and -M are significantly higher in patients who died from cardiovascular cause as compared with patients alive. In the final statistical model, Apo-C1, Apo-J, and Apo-M improve individually the prediction of cardiovascular death. Ingenuity pathway analysis indicates these three Apo in a network associated with lipid metabolism, atherosclerosis signaling, and retinoid X receptor activation. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic profiling of apolipoproteins using LC-MRM-MS might be useful in clinical practice for risk stratification of HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemesle et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in chronic systolic heart failure (n=198). Apolipoprotein levels (Apo-C1, Apo-J, Apo-M, Apo-B100, Apo-L1) vs. Patients alive after 3 years was evaluated on Cardiovascular death. Levels of Apo-C1, Apo-J, and Apo-M were significantly higher, and Apo-B100 and Apo-L1 significantly lower, in patients who died from cardiovascular causes compared to those alive at 3 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: