Key result
A mathematical modeling framework demonstrated that the nonlinear dependence of baroreceptor firing rate on blood pressure can be accurately predicted by accounting for the nonlinear elastic properties of the artery wall.
A novel modeling framework successfully predicts baroreceptor firing rates based on blood pressure by incorporating arterial wall nonlinear elastic properties and an integrate-and-fire neural model.
No immediate clinical application; leaves open validation of this rat-derived framework in human baroreflex studies.
In this study we develop a modeling framework for predicting baroreceptor firing rate as a function of blood pressure. We test models within this framework both quantitatively and qualitatively using data from rats. The models describe three components: arterial wall deformation, stimulation of mechanoreceptors located in the BR nerve-endings, and modulation of the action potential frequency. The three sub-systems are modeled individually following well-established biological principles. The first submodel, predicting arterial wall deformation, uses blood pressure as an input and outputs circumferential strain. The mechanoreceptor stimulation model, uses circumferential strain as an input, predicting receptor deformation as an output. Finally, the neural model takes receptor deformation as an input predicting the BR firing rate as an output. Our results show that nonlinear dependence of firing rate on pressure can be accounted for by taking into account the nonlinear elastic properties of the artery wall. This was observed when testing the models using multiple experiments with a single set of parameters. We find that to model the response to a square pressure stimulus, giving rise to post-excitatory depression, it is necessary to include an integrate-and-fire model, which allows the firing rate to cease when the stimulus falls below a given threshold. We show that our modeling framework in combination with sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation can be used to test and compare models. Finally, we demonstrate that our preferred model can exhibit all known dynamics and that it is advantageous to combine qualitative and quantitative analysis methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahdi et al. (2013) studied Baroreflex dynamics. Mathematical modeling of baroreceptor firing rate vs. Experimental rat data was evaluated on Model accuracy in predicting baroreceptor firing rate. A mathematical modeling framework demonstrated that the nonlinear dependence of baroreceptor firing rate on blood pressure can be accurately predicted by accounting for the nonlinear elastic properties of the artery wall.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: